Saturday, 8 June 2013

What on earth does it mean to be a "conservative?"



Finally, I decided to do a blog entry on what it means to be a "conservative." While I rarely use this term, it is what I most definitely consider myself to be. Some, if not many, aspects of what I believe fall within the lines of what a "libertarian" would believe, and when it comes to theology, my beliefs most definitely fall into the category of what some might define as being very orthodox or "conservative." 

However, my brand of "conservatism" differs rather greatly from the "All American" style of "neo-conservatism" that I have witnessed out on the internet and on Twitter. Being a city slicker myself, it is no wonder why my thinking differs from the "All American" view of what "conservatism" should be! The funny pic (above) depicts the cynical view of the average "All American conservative" often held by urbanites! The image of overweight, tough redneck types who cling to their Bibles & guns are legendary not only for American urbanites, but also for urban Europeans and others from around the world. And to be fair, rednecks are indeed some of the best riflemen in the world! I know this because of my previous military experience serving in an elite unit. Most of the guys that could shoot really well, were from the rural areas of like West Virginia, Arkansas, or Texas. The guys from the inner cities of NYC, LA, or DC were typically less skilled in the art of marksmanship. That was just my personal observation, not necessarily a fact!

Back to my point. So what is "conservative" and what is not? Let's start with the more commonly held public views or premises that are often tacitly pushed via Jewish-run mainstream media (MSM). 

The common view of the American Conservative:

1. Hates "big government" and claims to want smaller government. 
2. Is in favor of private gun ownership and the right to personal self-defense. 
3. Loves prosperity and favors private ownership rights (large house, car, etc).
4. Hates Birckenstocks and views them as the type of shoes that only neo-Liberals and hippies should be wearing. 
5. Some claim to be Christians, and of those who do, are typically Judeo Zionist Christians. Other conservatives are atheists or agnostics, and essentially believe that what they have was through their own work and efforts.
6. Are into hunting (both for food and for sport), and love to eat steak or potatoes. Those who are vegetarians or who are into "juicing" are looked upon as possibly being a "homosexual."
7. Claim to be against homosexual lifestyle, abortion, pornography, and illicit drugs.

While plenty more points could be added to the list above, I believe that many "All American" conservatives will likely agree with the list I compiled above. Yet, as a "conservative" myself, I can agree marginally with some of the points above. I will address each of the numbered points above with what I believe to be the pros/cons of each. 

Point #1: Hates "big government" and claims to want smaller government. 

Those of the libertarian mindset say they want smaller government, and that is exactly what they want... significantly smaller government. Yet, a very large contingent of neo-conservatives are in love with the Big Jewish-run and owned wars in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. They have bought into the lie that if we defeat "Christian-hating" Muslims "over there," we will not have to "fight them on our own soil!" The alleged "threat" of Muslims taking over America has been pushed hard in the media, and has also seen increased coverage in many mainline "alternative truther" news outlets. 

For certain, I do not want to see Muslims taking over America, nor do I want to ever see laws that would mandate that we all must worship Allah! Yet, with such a large contingent of "Judeo Christians" (70 Million+) in America, I could easily imagine the Jewish elites manipulating and staging a situation where Muslims do gain significant political power in America. After all, it is in the interest of the Jews running America to significantly destroy the "identity" of a "white Christian" America. Further, elitist Jews see that it is necessary to maintain a firm grip among Judeo Christians, and to accomplish such a feat, it is necessary to have the average Judeo Christian living in a constant state of "fear"...i.e., the fear of "boogeymen" such as the "evil" Muslims who are supposedly aiming to take over America! What better than for Jews to engage their Christian supporters in taking active participation in their Jewish-run crimes against humanity (i.e. the "big wars" in Iraq, etc), doing the "dirty work" so that Jews can claim plausible deniability for any blood that is shed?

Therefore, so many neo-con Judeo Christians are going to claim they are "conservative," but they are the very ones who have cried out to "big government" (run by their Jewish masters) to "save them" from those "evil" Muslims and it is these people who have NOT been conservative at all with my tax dollars (or yours)! Can anyone detect hypocrisy?

Point #2: Is in favor of private gun ownership and the right to personal self-defense. 

On this point, I can agree with many of the chief tenants about private gun ownership, and right to self defense. 

Yet, many neo-con conservatives who claim to be "pro-Corporation" fail to realize that it is the big corporations who are in full cahoots with the Jewish-run system to disarm the American public. That point is made in my previous blog entry called "Gun buyback in Van Nuys Masonic Temple." Many "conservatives" and "libertarians" would accuse me of being "liberal" because I speak negatively about large Corporations. Many of them believe that large corporations are merely a spinoff of the so-called "free market." Argue what you may, but I will note that most of today's corporations are Jewish-run, owned, or at the very least -- manipulated! And as Mussolini indicated, the merger of corporations and government yield fascism. 

Point #3: Loves prosperity and favors private ownership rights (large house, car, etc).

Many, but not all, conservatives seem to favor the so-called "American Dream" which is to get married, to have kids (two or three is common), to buy that nice large 4 bedroom house, and to have two or three sedans or SUV's parked out front. Those who live in large urban areas are going to need a large income to support this level or standard of living, and in 2013, there are fewer people/families that can afford this type of living accommodation than just a few years earlier. Yet, many conservatives, even today, pride themselves on still maintaining the above arbitrary standard of the "American Dream." 

In my view, even if one can afford the above, why not consider breaking the "American Dream" standard arbitrarily pushed by Jewish elites and keep more of the money that you have earned over the years where it belongs...in your pocket! While many conservatives believe that obtaining the "American Dream" is the ultimate "conservative goal," I argue just how conservative such a goal really is! 

What is "conservative" about obtaining a leveraged 30 year mortgage on a $1 Million to $2 Million dollar house, which is common for many nicer homes in larger urban areas? What is conservative about paying property taxes which amount to that which would be approximately the same as the monthly rent of any apartment in the same general location? The point I am making is that many so-called "conservatives" spend way more money than they need to! 

In my view, a true conservative lives beneath the level of comfort mandated by that which the Jewish elite have defined as the "American Dream." It is they who have told us lemmings what we should want, and what we should not want! So many conservatives are drinking their Koolaid, and if the Jewish banksters ever decide to pull the carpet out from beneath our feet, indeed there will be many very poor conservatives living in nice homes and nice cars in their parking lot, but with no money to fuel them, and no money or means to even feed themselves or their families! 

Point #4: Hates Birckenstocks and views them as the type of shoes that only neo-Liberals and hippies should be wearing. 

There are Jewish run companies often in trendy parts of town that allow their employees to dress casually, but who are opposed to them wearing Birckenstock sandals. A friend of mine worked for a medium-sized Jewish-owned company, and she told me that "Birckenstocks" were explicitly banned in the employee handbook. Yet, the employees there would wear nearly any other type of sandals or flip flops, and those were permitted. 

By the way, the CFO was a Jew, and he was the one who was responsible for this policy. Jews who are "mammon" or "money" oriented have done what they can to make "Birkenstocks" (or "Jesus sandals") uncool or not trendy! The common perception is that only liberal hippies wear them. Even Alex Jones (aka Alex Jonestein) makes fun of them on his popular radio show!

It is my contention that Jews have a natural hatred of nearly anything that even remotely reminds them of Jesus! Thus, if you live an area with a high Jewish population, and you want to irritate them, wear Birkenstocks! It will remind them of who they crucified 2000 years ago! 

While I do not wear Birkenstocks myself, I'm thinking that it might be a good time to start doing so! From all that I am told, they are extremely comfortable sandals, which are great for long distance urban walking. OBTW, most rich Jews don't like to walk too far...that is for the poor goyim! They would rather race around in their BMW's, Mercedes, or Rolls Royces!

Point #5: Some claim to be Christians, and of those who do, are typically Judeo Zionist Christians. Other conservatives are atheists or agnostics, and essentially believe that what they have was through their own work and efforts. 

As Rev. Jerry Falwell stated, there are over 70 Million+ Zionist Judeo Christians living in America. And, I would say a mass majority of them consider themselves to be "conservatives." However, as I will contend, their brand of Christianity is anything but "conservative." Their Biblical interpretation is often "legalistic" which falls into the liberal category of theology, and their desire for "big government" support of big Jewish wars (like the Iraq war) are anything but conservative. Judeo Christians, by and large, are huge supporters of big government, even though they hypocritically proclaim a desire for "small government!" See the funny pic (above)!

For those wanting more information on the liberal aspects of Judeo Christianity, you need to read "Why Muslims are persecuting Christians in the Middle East." You also should read some of my other previous blog entries which are tagged under the term "Zionism" or "Eschatology." 

As for those of you in the more "rational" conservative camp -- i.e., those of you who are "libertarians," I can agree a good bit more of what you believe, but there are things that you folks are also neglecting. Please read this entry entitled "Why Libertarian philosophy & psychology cannot save you!" This one is a critical read with a number of complex points which differentiate between libertarian truth and Biblical truth. While the intended audience is atheist libertarians, I am actually targeting atheists or agnostics of all varieties.

Point #6: Are into hunting (both for food and for sport), and love to eat steak or potatoes. Those who are vegetarians or who are into "juicing" are looked upon as possibly being a "homosexual." 

I suppose we can all thank people like the legendary Rocker Ted Nugent for this one! The concept that hunting and "meat eating" are the only pathway to becoming a true conservative. In my book, I point out that hunting is in accordance to Scripture; however, I make the point that the Bible only condones hunting for food, not for sport! Yet, Ted Nugent (and many others like him) believe that hunting for sport is also a "good thing." In my book, I differentiate between the two...one being in accordance to Scripture while the other is not. I also express my appreciation of animals as a part of God's creation which we are to love and respect when are not looking for meat to eat. That blog entry is called "What squirrels can teach the rest of us about life and about survival."

Also, if one views the funny pic (above), notice just how fat that lady is! Correct me if I am wrong, but my perception is that there are a lot of rural folk who have the same or similar body type. I should mention that there are a lot of her body type in the urban Jewish communities as well! For those that do not know, eating meat is very common among Jewish communities. They eat tons of it, and their obese body types are the evidence to prove that fact! 

Eating meat is fine as long as it is done in very "conservative" amounts! Notice the word "conservative" is often totally ignored by a high percentage of so-called "conservative" Americans! Some people eat meat nearly every day or every night for dinner! Those who do that, can and will eventually become obese. 

Once again, American conservatives who pride themselves on their hunting prowess, are not very "conservative" when it comes to the number of animals that they eat in a year! It is this very point that I make to depict just how "out of balance" many Americans are in their consumption of food. Is there anything conservative Americans can ever do that is in balance? 

How about eating meat once per week and then juicing on another day, and then eating some vegetables on yet another? Now that would actually be conservative! You would be using resources in balance, and I promise you that you would NOT look like the fat lady in the funny pic (above)! That is my promise to anyone who engages in genuine "conservative" dietary habits. 

Please note, that I am not judging you on what you eat. I am simply suggesting a more "conservative" dietary plan that is more balanced and more conservative! Those who eat less are more conservative than those who engage in gluttony! And for that, the Bible has a few harsh words to say on that topic.
19 whose end is destruction, whose god is their appetite, and whose glory is in their shame, who set their minds on earthly things. (Philippians 3:19; NASB)
20 Do not be with heavy drinkers of wine,
Or with gluttonous eaters of meat; (Proverbs 23:20; NASB)
31 Whether, then, you eat or drink or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. (1 Corinthians 10:31; NASB)
Therefore, my admonition is to become a true conservative and eat less, and to eat in a more balanced manner. You will be glad you ever did!

Point #7: Claim to be against homosexual lifestyle, abortion, pornography, and illicit drugs. 

I agree with the tenants of point #7, as many Christians do. However, there are some Christians who claim that homosexuality can be combined with living in accordance to God's Word. So-called "homosexual Christians" are one type who proclaim this, and I refuted their claim in a previous blog entry called ""One can be "gay" & Jewish, but not "gay" & Christian"" In this entry, I provide evidence right out of the Bible which depicts why the homosexual lifestyle and Biblical living cannot go together. 

It appears that many Zionist Judeo Christians and reformist ones (like myself) can agree on many of the tenants of point #7. Therefore, I will not go to exhaustive length regarding this one. However, that said, we should also note the hypocrisy of (some) neocons at the higher levels who participated in homosexual orgies at Bohemian Grove (watch the Alex Jones film). Here again, there are SOME so-called "conservatives" who claim to be against homosexuality, but then engage in it themselves. 

Conclusion:

Hopefully, this blog entries adds some clarity to the term -- "Conservative." In my view, a conservative is one who truly does conserve. He/she lives beneath the comfort level of that which the Jewish elites have set as "the standard" of what the "American Dream" should be. Remember, the Jewish elites want you to be poor. They want the average American to make and save less money, but to spend MORE of their hard-earned money. They have brainwashed Americans to want the big house, or expensive car, which is the very reason why so many Americans are NOT free! 

You only become a conservative when you "break the chains" of Jewish mind-control! Those who would like to learn how to become a true conservative (that actually does conserve), read my ENTIRE blog, and buy and read my book on survival preparation.

It is there that you will learn to get more out of life with less!

Wednesday, 5 June 2013

Why Muslims are persecuting Christians in the Middle East



Lately, we have hearing a fair amount of news reports about Christians being persecuted in the Middle East and in other predominantly Muslim regions of the world. Because of this fact, I feel compelled to do a blog entry on the topic of Christian persecution. Those who lived righteous lives during the Old Testament time period suffered persecution, and the New Testament predicted the same lot for the future of those believers in Jesus Christ.

The issue; however, that I am finding is the term "persecution" is being widely used, but the reasons behind it are not being addressed at all. Both Jews and Christians have a long history of persecution, and such persecution occurs today in some form or another, whether deserved or not. The line between persecution that is deserved and that which is not has been all but blurred and obliterated. More about this point will be explained further into this entry. 

Let's start with a news report, which is representative of the reports we have been seeing in more recent times. Read this article out of the New York Post called "Middle East genocide" by Ralph Peters. In this op ed, Peters makes reference to the fact that Jews *and* Christians are being persecuted. He makes a special reference to "Judeo Christians." 
"We are witnesses to murder, and our governments are accomplices. The relentless destruction of the last remnants of the Middle East’s Judeo-Christian civilization is well under way. And we are silent." (Source: Ralph Peters; "Middle East Genocide.")
What Peters discusses in his op ed is very popular "news" among Christians in America. So many Christians believe that the persecution that Christians are facing is that which the Bible predicted in the New Testament. But, is that really the case? 

There is a huge difference between "good" persecution which is that which the Bible predicts against those who are righteous in God's Word, and "bad" persecution which occurs to those who are living under God's curse! 

Jews are the perfect living example of a people who are living under God's curse. Even the Old Testament made reference to the Jews' curse in Malachi. Dr. Jay Adams said it best, and he even parlays it to today's America, which is Jew-run and owned. America (as a nation) is also under God's curse.
"But notice what Malachi had to say earlier on
I will curse your blessings (2:2; HCSB)
What an amazing statement! Think about it—all the wonderful things that God had done for His people would be cursed. That is to say, in the end, they would turn out to be a curse upon the sinning, unrepentant people, rather than the blessing they were intended to be.
Think about this statement—how much God has blessed America—but how those blessings have become a curse upon us since we misused them (focusing on the blessings rather than the One who gave them to us). Think about how the statement could be true of some of the blessings you personally have that, if misused, will also become a curse to you and your family rather than a blessing." (Source: Dr. Jay Adams; "Cursing the good!," May 13, 2013.)
By now, Christians need to discern between "good" persecution and "bad" persecution. No one knows more about "bad" persecution than the Jews themselves. Since 1948, Jews have been attacked by Arab Muslims in many places other than just the areas around Israel. Jews have also been persecuted for many other reasons unrelated to Muslims alone. But, I can assure you that in just about all cases, Jews have faced the "bad" type of persecution...the type one can expect to receive when they disobey God and His Word!

Now, I will shift this conversation back to the Christians of today, who are also facing the very same type of persecution in the Middle East and Muslim countries that Jews have faced for a long time. Peters, as referenced above, even makes a very specific statement about the type of Christians who have recently been persecuted...that is, "Judeo Christians." These type of Christians are essentially Judaizers who behave and act as Jews either knowingly or unknowingly. Read the "Judaizer" hyperlink (above) to better understand the definition of this term. Rev Jerry Falwell brags about just how many Judaizers there are in America:
"There are 70 million of us," he says. "And if there's one thing that brings us together quickly it's whenever we begin to detect our government becoming a little anti-Israel." (Source: Mary-Jayne McKay; "Zion's Christian Soldiers," February 11, 2009.)
Try to wrap your mind around this figure, that 1 in 4 Americans is a Zionist Judeo Christian! 70Million+!!! For every 4 human beings that you see walking on an American street, 1 of them is a Zionist Judeo Christian! My mind remains boggled by Falwell's statement! Now, I know just how much spiritual power the Jews have over the minds of Americans and over the minds of people around the world! And, I will assure you that the spiritual power that they have is not of God...the One who is Lord of the Heavens and the Earth!

With this many Christians acting as Jews, it is no wonder why Muslims hate Jews **&** Christians, not just Jews alone! When a Christian behaves like a Jew, that Christian essentially loses their identity as a "Christian" and is viewed as a "Jew" in the eyes of other people in the world. The number one claim that Muslims make when they conduct their terror attacks is that the Jews attacked them first. And, when they hit American targets or people, they claim Americans are in cahoots with Israel. Who can deny the truth of such a statement? Jews stormed into Palestine in 1948 and forced Muslims (and Christians) out. A good film to watch is "The Zionist Story - An Independent Documentary Film."  Yet, today, it is a well-known fact that Zionist Judeo Christians serve as a huge base for funding and moral support for the nation of Israel, and so many Muslims see the Judeo Christians as a threat to them as well. Such a view is a rational one. 

Thus, when Judeo Zionist Christians become married to the ways of the Jew, they then can expect to share the curse that has been upon Jews for a long time! I wrote a blog entry about this phenomenon called "Why Zionist Christians should not be 'spiritually-bound' with Jews." Read it! I should add that those who are "spiritually-bound" with the Jews, are subject to receive the "bad" type of persecution which I discussed above. God allows people who engage in sinful behavior to suffer the consequences both in this life as well as at final judgment. 

As Christians, shouldn't we prefer to suffer from "good" persecution...i.e., the type that we suffer from when "the world" hates the "truth" that we speak, or when we live in accordance to God's Word? 

 

Sunday, 12 May 2013

The Problems of Christian Identity, Aryanism, White Nationalism, and Hitler

A Critique of the Truth Movement

The Problems of Christian Identity, Aryanism, White Nationalism, and Hitler

I will analyze how an objective person who is intrigued by the Jewish question will view some of these websites that claim to expose International Jewry and be possibly turned off to it all. Here are a couple problems that I see in a lot of the alleged truth movement websites that make me skeptical of it being genuine at all:

Hitler Worship

Upholding Hitler as a hero that stood up to Jewish tyranny is a horrible idea, as an unsuspecting person is too firm in their beliefs about Hitler because of  the Jewish controlled media. Getting obsessed about a seventy years gone political figure that has been the subject of propaganda since his existence is exactly what they want you to do. It is a distraction from the empirical evidence we have of Jewish interference in our lives now that is not demonized by Jews and is easy to explain. Even though I do not believe the official account of the Holocaust, I believe that Hitler was a Jewish puppet of Jewish banks whose intent was to be a Judas Goat to destroy the German people. My suspicion of Hitler being a Jewish agent for the Jewish banks:

One major event of World War I was the Russian [Jewish funded and orchestrated] Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. This was the revolution which turned Russia into the communist nation we knew for most of the 20th century. The Revolution occurred one year before the end of World War I. It was led in large part by Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov, who is better known by his code name, “Lenin” [Jewish].
At the time of the Revolution, Russia was an enemy of Germany. The grimness of World War I had aroused in the Russian people a strong anti-German sentiment. Opponents of Bolshevism were able to use this sentiment against the [Jewish] Bolsheviks by accusing Lenin of being a German agent. To some degree, this accusation was true. Sir Winston Churchill [Jewish], Prime Minister of Great Britain during World War II, wrote, “They [the Germans] transported Lenin in a Sealed Train like a plague bacillus from Switzerland to Russia.” Churchill was referring to the train on which Lenin and his entourage traveled from their revolutionary headquarters in Switzerland through Germany to Russia in order to lead the Revolution which had already gotten underway. The German military guaranteed safe passage for Lenin’s train through Germany, but would not permit Lenin or his followers to step off the train while it was on German soil. At the train’s first stop in Germany after crossing the border from Switzerland, it was met and boarded by two German officers who provided a silent escort for the revolutionary party. The officers had been briefed earlier by General Erich Ludendorff, Chief of Staff of the German 8th Army on the Eastern Front. Ludendorff later became one of Germany’s most powerful political figures and a prominent supporter of Adolf Hitler.
Michael Pearson, author of an excellent book, The Sealed Train, presents evidence that the Germans continued to support the Bolsheviks even after the Russian Revolution was over. The German military wanted to ensure that the Bolsheviks were able to retain their power in Russia. According to German Foreign Office records released after World War II, the Foreign Office had allocated by February 5, 1918 a total of 40,580,997 German marks for Russian “propaganda” and “special purposes.” Most of that money is believed to have been sent directly to the new communist regime…According to the same documents, fifteen million marks had been released to Russia by the German Treasury just one day after Lenin officially assumed power in November of 1917. A telegram sent December 3, 1917 by Richard von Kuhlman, German Foreign Secretary, stated:
… it was not until the Bolsheviks had received from us a steady flow of funds through various channels that they were in a position to build up their main organ Pravda [link], to conduct energetic propaganda and appreciably to extend the originally narrow base of their party.
Three months later, another telegram sent by von Kuhlman revealed:
… the Bolshevik movement could never have attained the scale or the influence which it has today without our continual support.
Lenin understandably denied accusations that he had received any assistance from Germany. Germany was Russia’s enemy, and Lenin would have been considered a traitor to Russia. After all, why would capitalist Germany assist communists? The oppressive Russian Tsar had already abdicated before the Revolution and the Provisional Government set up in his place was a republican form of government patterned after the United States.
Most people believe that Germany helped Lenin overthrow the Provisional Government in order to end Russian involvement in World War I. German military leaders wanted nothing more than to disengage from the Eastern Front so that badly-needed soldiers and supplies could be moved elsewhere. The Provisional Government had continued the war against Germany, whereas the Bolsheviks did indeed pull Russia out of World War I after they took power.
The question is then raised: why did Germany aid communist revolutionaries? There were other political groups in Russia which could have been supported.
For one thing, the Bolsheviks probably stood the best chance at success. A more important factor is that some very prominent German industrialists and financiers with influence into the German military were supporters of the communist movement. Their support had begun long before World War I. One of Karl Marx’s [Jewish] most visible backers had been the wealthy German industrialist Friedrich Engels. Engels even co-authored the Communist Manifesto with Marx. Significant support for communism also came from the German banking community. Max Warburg [Jewish], a top leader in German finance, lent his assistance to the Bolsheviks, as did banker Jacob Schiff [Jewish] who, though an American, came from the same German family which had shared a house in Frankfurt generations earlier with the Rothschild [Jewish] family. According to Schiff’s grandson, Schiff had loaned about twenty million dollars to the early communist government in Russia. The combined infusion of Western loans and German treasury money was the only thing that enabled the early Bolshevik regime to survive.
There were many reasons why Western bankers financed the Bolsheviks. The common origins of communism and the inflatable paper money system in the same mystical network is one factor to be considered. Marxism closely followed the basic philosophical pattern of Christianity and other Custodial religions with their “final battle” and Utopian messages. Perhaps the most important fact about modern communism to explain Western banking support is the fact that communism is actually capitalism taken to an extreme.
Another messiah was gaining a large following in Germany. His “Coming” was said to be the beginning of the Millennium. Using one of the Brotherhood’s most important symbols, the swastika, that German Messiah’s name was Adolf Hitler.
During his young adulthood before rising to power, Hitler lived in Vienna. One of Hitler’s friends during that period was Walter Johannes Stein [Jewish]. During World War II, Dr. Stein became an advisor to England’s Prime Minister, Sir Winston Churchill. Much of what Dr. Stein had to say about Hitler’s early life found its way into a book entitled, Spear of Destiny, by Trevor Ravenscroft.
Hitler did not develop his ideology in a vacuum. One of his most influential mentors was a Viennese bookstore owner named Ernst Pretzsche [Jewish]. Pretzsche was described by Dr. Stein as a malevolent-looking man with a somewhat toad-like appearance. Pretzsche was a devotee of the Germanic mysticism that was preaching the coming of an Aryan superrace. Hitler frequented Pretzsche’s store and pawned books there when he needed money. During those visits, Pretzsche indoctrinated Hitler in Germanic mysticism and successfully encouraged Hitler to use the hallucinogenic drug peyote as a tool for achieving mystical enlightenment.
As it turns out, Pretzsche was associated with a man named Guido von List. Von List was a founding member and leading figure in an occult lodge which used a swastika instead of a cross in its rituals. Before he was disgraced and forced to flee from Vienna, von List had gained a large audience for his Germanic mystical writings. Hitler became a member of that audience through Pretzsche.
Naziism was clearly more than a political movement. It was a powerful new Brotherhood faction steeped in Brotherhood beliefs and symbols. The emblem chosen to represent the Nazi party was the swastika—an important Brotherhood symbol since antiquity. Hitler was proclaimed not only a political messiah, but also a religious messiah whose Coming signaled the fulfillment of the apocalyptic philosophies espoused by German mystical groups. Hitler’s Coming was to bring about the “Thousand Year Reich”—a millennium in which mankind would be “purified” and reach its highest state of existence. Naziism was a Custodial religious philosophy as much as it was a political ideology. In a speech he gave at the Nazis’ 1934 Nuremburg Rally, Hitler said about the Party, “its total image, however, will be like a holy order.”
Naziism and all of its atrocities could never have happened without the support of the German [Jewish] banking fraternity. Banking, industry, and government were as tightly interwoven in Nazi Germany as they are in nearly every nation today. In Germany, many bankers held management positions in other companies, not the least of which was I. G. Farben. For example, Max and Paul Warburg [Jewish], who ran major banks in Germany and the United States (and who, incidentally, had been instrumental in establishing the [Jewish run and owned] Federal Reserve system in the United States), were I. G. Farben directors. H. A. Metz of I. G. Farben was a director of the Bank of Manhattan, which was a Warburg bank in the United States that later became part of the Chase Manhattan Bank managed by the Rockefeller [Jewish] family.* One director of American I. G. Farben was C. E. Mitchell, who was also director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and of National City Bank. Most significantly, Herman Schmitz [Knights of Malta, Jewish], President of I. G. Farben in Germany, had served on the boards of the Deutsche Bank and the Bank for International Settlements. As we recall, the Bank for International Settlements was the apex of the international central banking community and the interlocking inflatable paper money systems. Schmitz was one of the few I. G. Farben executives sentenced to a prison term at Nuremburg. He received a ten-year sentence.
Perhaps the most surprising support for Hitler in the international banking fraternity came from the director of the Bank of England, Montague Norman [Judaism inspired Mason]. England, of course, was an enemy of Nazi Germany during World War II. According to Dr. Quigley’s book, Tragedy and Hope, Mr. Norman was the “commander in chief of the world system of banking control during his governership of the Bank of England from 1920 until 1944. Said Dr. Quigley:
… many wealthy and influential persons like Montague Norman, and Henri Detering [owner of Shell Oil] directed public attention to the danger of Bolshevism while maintaining a neutral, or favorable, attitude toward Naziism.
The Bank of England continued to support Hitler even after the Nazi dictator embarked on his program of conquest. After Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia in violation of the non-aggression pact between then-Prime Minister Chamberlain of England and Hitler, the Bank of England gave Nazi Germany six million Pounds of Czech gold reserves held by the Bank.
In the same way that a small clique of German petty princes had made a fortune from war in the 18th century by renting soldiers to warring nations, a small clique of banks and multinational corporations made a large profit by providing goods and services to both sides fighting in World War II. After giving early support to Hitler, the Bank of England naturally provided loans to Britain to fight Hitler. At the same time that the German subsidiaries of I.T.T. and General Electric were giving money to the SS and providing needed services to Nazi Germany, other branches in America and elsewhere were aiding Germany’s enemies. As I. G. Farben fueled Hitler’s war machine in Germany, one of its old cartel partners, Standard Oil, fueled the allied effort against Germany. While the Ford [Judaism inspired Mason] Motor Company produced materials for the American army to fight Germany, Ford plants in Germany were turning out military vehicles for the Nazis. No matter who won the war, those [Jewish] banks and companies would profit and find favor with whoever emerged victorious.
The overwhelming role that various [Jewish] bankers and industrialists played in propping up Hitler and in building the Nazi war machine has caused some historians to view those bankers and industrialists as the true powers behind Naziism. They were indeed highly significant, but were they actually the ultimate sources that gave us Naziism?
It is unfortunate that the Nazi defeat and reported deaths of Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler did not end Nazi influence in the world. After World War II, Nazis participated in many important spheres of activity:
The American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) accepted the offer of Reinhart Gehlen [Knights of Malta, established the Israeli Mossad], Chief of Russian Intelligence operations in the Nazi Secret Service, to help build the American intelligence network in Europe after the war. Gehlen’s organization was staffed by many former SS members. The Gehlen organization became a significant element of the CIA in Western Europe and it also provided the foundation for the intelligence apparat of modern West Germany. The CIA also extracted information about Nazi psychiatric techniques from Nuremburg war crime trial records for use in the CIA’s infamous mind control experiments decades later.
Interpol, the private international police organization which is supposed to combat international criminals and drug traffickers, was headed by former Nazi SS officers several times up until 1972. This is not surprising when we consider that Interpol was controlled by the Nazis during World War II.
Prince Bernhard [Jewish Khazar] of the House of Orange in the Netherlands had been a member of the SS before the war, followed by a stint as an employee of I. G. Farben. He then married into the House of Orange and assumed his position as chairman of Shell Oil. Prince Bernhard founded the international “Bilderberg” [Jews and Judaism inspired Masons] meetings, which are still held every year. The Bilderberg meetings are meant to be informal get-togethers of the world’s top bankers, industrialists, political figures, and other prominent people for the purpose of discussing world conditions and reaching an occasional informal consensus. Prince Bernhard personally chaired these meetings until 1976, when a corruption scandal forced him to resign. (Bramley, William. 1989. The Gods of Eden. New York, New York: HarperCollins Publishers, p.338-341, 375-390)

The fact of the matter is that there are too many inconsistencies about Hitler to make him worth worshiping in the first place. After discovering the aforementioned piece and reading the book Hitler Founder of Israel (download), I now firmly believe that Hitler and the Nazis were controlled opposition. First of all, the author is a Jew named Hennecke Kardel who I believe is trying to cover up the fact that Hitler was controlled opposition. Hennecke Kardel states that Hitler was one quarter Jewish and the grandson of a prominent Jewish family (some say he was a grandson of a Rothschild), and that Hitler had contempt for his own Jewishness and wanted to rid the world of International Jewry.

I do not believe that Hitler was genuine because he worked for the German military police after he fought in World War I, during the Jewish Soviet Weimar Republic. After he rose in prominence in the political scene, Hitler was funded by Jews with the intent to infiltrate the German Workers Party and merge it with the National Socialists to form the NSDAP. Hitler seemed primarily concerned with removing Jewish Bolsheviks from his country while still being funded by Jews in general. I see Hitler’s ideology of socialism as just one of the tentacles of International Jewry and it is laughable that Hitler made a distinction between Eastern Jews (Communists) and Western Jews (Capitalists). Socialism–created by Jew Moses Hess, like communism, which is derived from Talmudic Judaism and created by Karl Marx (Jewish, real name Mordecai Levi), demands submission and obedience to a figure of authority, whether the state or in this case Hitler, in order for a promise of salvation or Utopia. It is evident many people in Germany blindly followed their leader under the guise that his party platform and fascist policies would free them from Jewish tyranny. It is also suspect how Hitler emerged from a Soviet system of communism unscathed without some sort of civil war. Do you really think that the Jewish Soviet Weimar Republic would give up power if the NSDAP were not controlled opposition and a genuine threat to International Jewry?

Jews appear to be a main component of Hiter’s rise to power in Germany, and very soon after Hitler became Chancellor of Germany his inner circle was completely filled with people who had at least some Jewish blood. By the mid nineteen thirties, upwards of sixty percent of Germany’s Jewish population had left the country in order to immigrate to Israel. The anti-Semitic newspapers that Hitler’s NSDAP party disseminated before coming into power were owned by Jews as well.
I see World War II as any other war, funded on both sides by Jewish banks and Jewish puppets in order to kill as many non-Jews as possible. Hitler was not acting in a noble “Aryan” manner in his quest for lebensraum when he went into Czechoslovakia and received the gold reserves from those Jewish banks that were supposedly his enemies. Hitler’s quest to supposedly defeat the tyranny of Jewish bankers ultimately got fifty million people killed during warfare. There is also the suspicious strategic military decision by Hitler to let the British forces retreat at Dunkirk, as he did not think that Western Jews were top priority. Ultimately, this was a war that Hitler was never supposed to win, it was designed to make Jews around the world look like victims under the fake Holocaust narrative and form the state of Israel.

The controlled opposition websites who do nothing but worship Hitler want to make us look like militant racist Ku Klux Klan members (Jewish created–check article on this website) and neo-Nazi groups that have shaved heads and goose step. These controlled opposition groups want to channel our anger and energy into prescribed avenues that will be counterproductive and ultimately useless, which will make anyone participating in these groups look crazy or violent. An objective person who is truth seeking will look at someone who is Jew-wise and glorifies Hitler and conclude that: Anti-Semite = Hitler worshiper = neo-Nazi = (possibly) Ku Klux Klan member who wants to kill Blacks and other minorities. This objective person will ultimately want nothing to do with such a movement and will distance themselves from it. Links concerning the Nazis being Jewish and controlled opposition here, here, here, and here. Guilty parties: Total Fascism, Truth Militia, and White Network.

Peddling Christian Identity and British Israelism

Judaism is a Jewish Supremacist doctrine. Christian Identity and British Israelism follow in the same footsteps of Judaism and are both White Supremacism.

British Israelism emerged as an ideology after the English Revolution. The English Revolution was the effective takeover of England by the Jewish Rothschild banks, who overthrew the monarchy with the help of Jew Oliver Cromwell. The Jewish Rothschilds created British Israelism as an ideology for the non-Jews of Britain, which to begin with was based on subjective interpretations of Biblical scripture. It was created for the non-Jews in order for them to embrace the essence and attitudes of Judaism, which subsequently meant engaging in world conquest and colonialism. With the British believing that they were the real Jews, they colonized, raped, and pillaged their way through the world, while the Jewish Rothschilds were behind the scenes using England as a base for their global empire; however, today, after the rise and fall of the British Empire, has emerged a new superpower, the United States, which is engaging in the same acts of the British. In other words, the United States is being used a front for International Jewry, just as Britain was then.

Christian Identity emerged as an ideology after British Israelism, which through the subjective interpretation of Biblical scripture makes the same claims that today’s Jews are impostors and that the White nations and the United States are the true Israel. Essentially, this viewpoint is no different than British Israelism and is open to abuse and the same attitudes that Jews hold of themselves and of others that is reinforced in Judeo-Christianity. This type of thinking is lethal to humanity and has allowed self-chosen Jews to have a reign of terror over so-called lessor people in this world up to today.

Why do people peddle these viewpoints? To offer bad solutions to a problem. How? So that if somehow Jews did get attacked for their subversive control of their host societies and thrown from power, Jews could pose as Whites (crypto-Jews), which they do as already and maintain the status-quo. It does not make sense to want to replace world figures with White people to continue the trend of the “chosen ones” if you are critical of Jewish Supremacism. You would be replacing what you despise with the exact same thing, which would change nothing. White people should not be chosen to rule over the world just like the Jews do, just to recreate the same problems, so believing in Christian Identity would be a no better solution for the world than the current Judeo-Christian order we have today. The reason we are in this mess to begin with is the Christian Zionists who allowed and continue to allow International Jewry and Israel to commit atrocities and subversion around the globe because they are a special “chosen people”.

Aside from the fact that the Christian Identity ideology is completely absurd, is that it is also disseminated on Internet forums and comments sections to divide and conquer. Hasbara trolls will use Christian Identity to derail a conversation about Jews in order to get people talking about a mundane topic. A religious topic like Christian Identity is surely a topic that will inflame many participants and subsequent discussions will dovetail into irrelevant religious arguments. Christian Identity is also popular among convicts in jail and with White Supremacists in particular, who may get shortened sentences in order to be paid shills under the control of the FBI to disseminate this ideology throughout the Internet. In reality, Christian Identity ideology is prevalent in religious cults in the Unites States, and it appears to not be a widely held belief anyway, yet somehow you always seem to stumble by a Christian Identity believer who tries to tell you that Jews are not the real Jews and that the Bible has been perverted. Whatever the case, it is a diversionary tactic as it is ignoring Jewish control of our lives in this current moment. Guilty parties: Pro Think, Total Fascism, and Truth Militia.

What history shows and what you will read about in the following piece is that whenever some racial or ethnic group claims superiority over others, it is used as impetus to start controlling other people.

India: That land of mystery. It is a place where the spiritual arts flourish and the material arts wane. It is a country where nearly all life is held sacred, yet millions starve. To many people, the nation of India and the religion of Hinduism seem almost inseparable, as though they were created together and together they may one day die. The Hindu religion is adhered to by nearly 85% of India’s almost 800 million population, yet the India we have come to know and most of the religion it practices today were not created in India at all. The caste system, the majority of the Hindu gods, the Brahmin rituals, and the Sanskrit language were all brought in and imposed on the Indian people by foreign invaders many centuries ago. Somewhere between 1500 B.C. (the time of Thutmose in in Egypt) and 1200 B.C. (the time of Moses), the Indian subcontinent was invaded from the northwest by tribes of people known as “Aryans.” The Aryans made themselves India’s new ruling class and forced the native Indians into a servient status.
Precisely who the Aryans were and exactly where they came from is a puzzle still debated today. Historians have generally used the word “Aryan” to denote those peoples who spoke the Indo-European languages, which include English, German, Latin, Greek, Russian, Persian, and Sanskrit. “Aryan” also has a narrower racial meaning. It has quite often been used to designate mankind’s non-Semitic white-skinned race.
There are many theories about where Aryans first came from. A common hypothesis is that Aryans originated in the steppes (plains) of Russia. From there they may have migrated to Europe and down into Mesopotamia. Others believe that the Aryans arose in Europe and migrated east-ward. Some theorists, occasionally for racist reasons, claim that Aryans were the founders of the ancient Mesopotamian civilizations and were therefore the world’s first civilized peoples.[...]The Nazis even claimed that Aryans were originally created by godlike superhumans from a different world. A similar belief was expressed earlier in history. When Spanish conqueror, Pizarro, invaded South America in 1532, the South American natives referred to the Spanish invaders as Viracochas, which meant “white masters.” Native legends in South America told of a master race of huge white men who had come from the heavens centuries before. According to the legends, those “masters” had reigned over South American cities before disappearing again with a promise of return. The South American natives thought that the Spaniards were the returning Viracochas and so they initially allowed the Spaniards to seize the Americans’ gold and treasures without resistance.
Whatever the true origin of the Aryan race may or may not have been, many religious and mystical beliefs have been expressed throughout the world about the supposed superiority of the Aryan race over other races. Such beliefs are sometimes labelled “Aryanism.” Aryanism is the elevation of white-skinned Aryans over other races based on the notion that Aryans are the “chosen” or “created” race of “God” (or Custodial “gods”), and Aryans are therefore-spiritually, socially and genetically superior to all other races[...]the Japanese, also possess similar legends of having been born of extraterrestrial “gods.”. (Bramley, William. 1989. The Gods of Eden.  New York, New York: HarperCollins Publishers, p.94-96)

Militant Racism & Race Baiting

Websites that claim to be Jew wise and then constantly post about Black and non-White crime against Whites baffle me. Are these website owners really that ignorant or is there a sinister motive at play? These website owners should know better than to engage in demagoguery, right? I believe that the websites that engage in this type of behavior are controlled opposition. Why? Because good ideas that unite are dangerous. The Jews who wrote the Protocols were aware of this and state:

There is nothing more dangerous than personal initiative: If it has genius behind it, such initiative can do more than can be done by millions of people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct the education of the GOYIM communities that whenever they come upon a matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in despairing impotence. (The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, 5.11)

The demagogues who post about Black on White crime on their supposed Jew wise sites are spreading discord, as the Protocols predicted that they would.
What some White Nationalists that come off as openly hostile to non-Whites do not realize is that most non-White people come to Western countries because of poor economic conditions, famine, and war created by International Jewry. Some of these White Nationalists make it seem like there is a conspiracy by non-Whites to invade these countries on purpose to make their lives miserable. The truth is that most of these non-Whites do not want to pack up what little belongings they have and move half way across the world to a totally foreign environment, however, due to their homelands being treated as a sandbox for slavery by International Jews, many of them do not have a choice. One in ten people from the Philippines work abroad.

Knowing this, all of our focus must be directed to the International Jew, because they are the nation-wreckers who are at the root of all of the problems that we have in our world. Getting mad at non-Whites and the discriminatory hiring policies of Affirmative Action in Western countries is getting mad at the symptoms, and not the disease. The disease is the International Jew who infiltrated our White countries and liberalized the immigration and hiring policies to create animosity and racial tensions in our multicultural societies. Guilty parties: Storm Front, VNN, and Truth Militia.

White Nationalism is a Divide and Conquer Strategy Used in Multicultural Countries

A lot of White Nationalists are thinking on a too small of a scale. They do not realize they are battling a concept called International Jewry. I am also suspicious of anyone who wants to limit the task of tackling the Jewish question to White people only. I want to tell people of all races and ethnicities of this problem that plagues all of humanity. This is about survival, not happily standing in a multicultural circle holding hands, as I do not believe in multiculturalism. One thing is certain though, if Whites want their countries back they will need all the help they can get.
This is Turkish pop singer Demet Akalın. According to White Nationalists, this woman is not White because of her culture. Would you breed with this fine specimen?
This is Turkish pop singer Demet Akalın. According to White Nationalists, this woman is not White because of her culture. Would you breed with this fine specimen?


What strict White Nationalists do not realize is that they wish for a pan-White movement with other Whites who do not necessarily share the same culture as them, but just because they are White they can unite for a common cause against International Jewry. Basing a social movement along the guidelines of skin color is shaky because of the subjectivity of where the line is on some one being classified as being White or not. Is the White Nationalist movement for Whites that are Nordics with blond hair and blue eyes and subscribe to Scandinavian culture? What about darker looking Southern Europeans who are olive skinned with brown hair and brown eyes and are ethnic Muslims? What if I told you there are albino looking Turks that are ethnic Muslims that would have almost no cultural similarities to their biological relatives in Western Europe, do you include them in the movement too?

There are two problems that need to be solved here, the first, which is the cultural issue because the Whites who have lived in North America and Western Europe for generations have had their culture high jacked by International Jews and replaced with their Talmudic vision; the second, is reverting back to a pre-globalized world and structuring countries based on nationalism.
What White Nationalists yearn for does not exist anymore, so there is no use to be a colorist on this issue that will just alienate more people who are also suffering under this multicultural system. Whites will have to collude with non-Whites until Whites become self-determined in their own countries and are able to restructure and repair the damage that liberal immigration policies have caused. It will require a world revolution to overthrow the International Jews because it is a worldwide problem. The more people we can get on our side against these nation-wreckers, the stronger we all will be. Set aside your differences for a moment to prevent the destruction of each and every race and culture on Earth, which is what will happen to all of us in our global pluralist society if we do not act now. We must use our strength of numbers to work together and achieve that goal. Once the Jewish power elite have been overthrown, we can repair the damage that multiculturalism has caused.

Conclusion

You may not even care about what is happening in Gaza and the genocide of Palestinians, however, it is the blueprint for how the world will be when International Jewry has total control of every single aspect of our lives on every inch of the globe. Stop fighting with each other, because every single person’s life is at stake.
Note: this article has been modified since it was first published.


Source: This blog entry was re-posted and originates from the following weblink: http://stopcg.wordpress.com/a-critique-of-the-truth-movement/

Wednesday, 8 May 2013

What not to wear -- BTW, Who runs fashion?

After viewing a Twitter interaction between La Culinary Composer and the famed "fashion consultant" icon -- Clinton Kelly known for his appearance on a number of Television shows. "What not to wear" is the one I remember best.

La Culinary Composer ("LCC" for short) tweeted Kelly after his retweet of a Macy's youtube clip posting of him extolling the virtues of wearing "color jeans," which are now (as of 2013) the trend that the sheeple are now expected to follow. Just about everywhere I look, both males and females are wearing either solid red, solid orange, or solid teal-colored jeans. Red is the biggest color of all. This fashion concept is a unisex one that has been pushed through the various media channels now for a number of months. 

5h
Does the idea of wearing color shock you back into black? Wanna learn? Just ask

Friday, 3 May 2013

Jewish Lawmaker insulted by Jesus' name -- Should we be surprised?

I saw this posting by WorldNetDaily entitled Jewish lawmakers insulted by 'Jesus prayers' and wanted to add a few of my own comments. I read WorldNetDaily (WND) from time to time, as it is an alternative "truth" and Christian-based online publication. My criticism; however, is that most of the articles/essays that I have ever seen them publish are ones holding to Zionist Christian premises (i.e., those who hold to the "premillennialist dispensationalist" or "sensationalist" perspective). 

Every now and then, we might see a title like the one I've linked to above, where the Zionist Christians somehow believe it is "big news" when they hear about a Jewish lawmaker being insulted by 'Jesus prayers.' Here is the introduction to this WND article:
"(CHRISTIAN NEWS) — A Jewish lawmaker in Florida approached the Speaker of the House this week on behalf of other Jewish legislators who state that they are offended and insulted by the practice of praying in the name of Jesus during House sessions.
Jim Waldman of Coconut Creek contacted Speaker Will Weatherford to explain why what he called “the J.C. moment” presents a problem.
“This year more so than others, every time the prayer comes up, it’s in Jesus’ name,” he said. “This is my seventh year talking about it, and it’s getting to be too much. It would be nice to have an inclusive prayer.”
Waldman noted that some Jewish representatives will not enter the room until the invocation is finished so that they do not have to hear the name of Jesus." (Source: WND, http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/jewish-lawmakers-insulted-by-jesus-prayers/?cat_orig=faith
Should anyone be surprised by Jim Waldman's (the Jewish lawmaker's) comments? Perhaps if you are a Zionist Christian, you just might be! After all, you believe Jews are God's chosen people. You believe that Jews share many, if not most of the goals that a Christian shares. In truth, the opposite is in fact the case. 

Yet, when a Zionist Christian expresses any hint of surprise that a Jewish lawmaker is offended by Jesus' name, this should be a no-brainer! If I wanted to be rude, it would be enough for me to say "duhhhh!!" in the face of those who are surprised by Waldman's comments. 

There is nothing new about what we are witnessing from people like Waldman. Jews who subscribe to Judaism, are by their very nature, haters of Jesus Christ and all that He stands for! Get this single point through your heads! I know this information is painful! You would rather chant "conservative" (if I may even use that word) slogans such as "I stand with Israel" and feel like you too are one of God's chosen! 

By the way, Jews like Waldman have the power to initiate a ban of using Jesus' name either in House sessions or even on a wider scale. I am issuing this warning, so that Zionist Christians (and other Judaizing Christians -- such as Seventh-Day Adventists) can wake up to the reality of what is going on!

Some very good reading for those who are surprised by the fact that a Jewish laymaker would dare say that he is insulted by Jesus' name should read a blog entry by Dr. Jay Adams called "Controversy in the New Testament." Consider these points which Dr. Adams makes regarding the intent of the New Testament (NT):
"In the Gospels Jesus warns against false teachers, speaks of wolves in sheep’s clothing and the “leaven of the Pharisees.” The record of His ministry is one of conflict with those who refused to accept the teaching He set forth....
Galatians is a sterling defense of Justification by faith alone over against those who taught otherwise, and were upsetting the church by Judaistic legalism....
Hebrews, in its entirety, combats all influences that would cause Jewish Christians to revert to Judaism....
I Peter explains how the New Testament church is no longer a physical political entity, but that the church is now the spiritual people of God, the new Israel....
Revelation speaks of the warfare of God against apostate Judaism, the first persecutor of the church, and Rome, the second persecutor, and predicts the fall. It also mentions cults like the Nicolatians.
Now, in light of the above, if you can, tell me, why we should not be prepared to detect and refute falsehood in the Church?" (Source: Dr. Jay Adams blog; http://www.nouthetic.org/blog/?p=6054
Those who understand Dr. Adams' points above, and for those who truly understand God's Word, you will know that the New Testament's intent was to drive us Christians away from the ways of the Jew, not to make us more like them! Yet, ironically, 1/4 of all Americans consider themselves to be a Zionist (Judaizing) Christian married to the wickedness wrought by present day Jewry! If this WND article was big news to you, it should not be. Stop supporting Israel. Stop holding Jews as a 'holy cow.' And, stop voting for Jews like Jim Waldman who occupy high-level lawmaking positions in government who will no doubt, take actions to ban the mere mention of Jesus!



Friday, 26 April 2013

BDSM Masochistic Sex site links to my Yahoo CEO blog entry




A Twitter profile by the name of "Strict Restraint" linked to my blog entry that I wrote recently (on April 23rd) called "Yahoo CEO to set new corporate trend to end telecommuting!" Their website can be found here. WARNING: This website contains sexually explicit and sexually deviant content. Ordinarily, the types of people who link to my blog entries are those who generally share a common interest in the topics that I tweet or blog about. This time; however, it is a kinky porn site that found interest in my blog entry. 

Then it suddenly hit me after viewing April 23rd issue of the "Slave Times", that there is a very real parallel between the feministic aspects of BDSM sex and the New World Order (NWO) System of bondage that we are all going into! Now I can see why a Jewish elite running the porn industry and Hollywood would love to promote this type of sexuality among a wider population. My guess is that we can expect to see more of it in the future, because the Jewish power brokers are now putting (bitchy) women in charge at the corporate level of companies (like Yahoo). And as the saying goes, only the most ruthless are allowed in those type of positions. The two photos side-by-side (above) speak more than a thousand words in that one (image on the left) is a symbol of "female domination" and the other (image on the right) an icon of "female domination" -- both in support of a Jewish-run wicked world that is adamently against all that Jesus Christ stands for! In fact, just how hard would it be to append the left image to that of the one on the right so there is an imaginary concantenation of the two images?

I invite you the reader to view the "Slave Times" and to see some of the photos of "men" (if I may even use that word) being dominated by some bitchy female dominatrix! God never created "man" to succumb to this type of treatment, and yet that is just where the Jewish-run NWO system is taking us!




Sunday, 14 April 2013

Yahoo CEO to set new corporate trend to end telecommuting!



The photo above is of the new CEO of Yahoo (Marissa Mayer), who is 37 years old. Indeed she looks older than her years, and she, like so many other 'highly conformed' female executives, wears the fake blond (straight hair) mop on her head! OBTW, the name "Mayer" is a Jewish name. Click here for confirmation of that fact! After all, the CEO's of Google, Facebook, and Microsoft are Jewish, why would it be any different with Yahoo might I add? Tech has been controlled by the Jewish elitist technocrats for many years.

The article which prompted this blog entry is called "CEO Mayer calls in all Yahoo telecommuters."  And, here are some of Mayer's mandates from the above article and are quoted below:
"According to published memos, Mayer told telecommuting employees that starting in June, their days of working at home are over.... 'To become the absolute best place to work, communication and collaboration will be important, so we need to be working side-by-side,'... 'That is why it is critical that we are all present in our offices. Some of the best decisions and insights come from hallway and cafeteria discussions, meeting new people, and impromptu team meetings. Speed and quality are often sacrificed when we work from home. We need to be one Yahoo, and that starts with physically being together.'"
What we are now seeing is a new socialized trend which Mayer is now spearheading. That trend is that of the future employee who is and will be increasingly enslaved! This progressive feminist authoritarian (neo-liberal as many would refer to her as) wants total control over her employees! She wants all bottoms firmly in their chairs at the office! So much for "work/life balance" and the other perks that high technology can provide. This feminist (likely Jewish) witch wants maximum control over her slaves! 

What angers me more is that Mayer's actions are now setting a new precedent for other employers that would otherwise be open to telecommuting. However, once other employers believe that there is a new trend in the works, it is most often the case that they too will seize upon the opportunity to follow the current trends. Any new norm that benefits those at the top is one that is likely to spread like a disease or like a wildfire. So to all the tech yuppies and other worker slaves out there, get ready for an increase of your loss of rights in the workplace!

So, is Mayer a Jew? Her name is indeed Jewish, and she is very likely to come from the Jewish bloodline. However, Jewish-run Wikipedia claims that she is actually a Lutheran! I have not been able to uncover enough personal information to support this claim, and she does proclaim faith in God, family, and Yahoo (in that order), but so too could any Jew proclaim the same! After all, Jews (under Judaism) proclaim faith in God (or G-d as they write it), but Jews cannot know Him without acceptance of Jesus (ref: John 14:6). So, if Mayer is in fact a God-fearing Christian who actually accepts Jesus, I have not been able to obtain any confirmed evidence of this on the internet.

Aside from the debate of whether Mayer is Jewish or not, we should also look at the fruit of her actions, which are indeed along the lines of the Jewish global domination model. Who in their right mind believes that a true God-fearing Christian (who actually follows God's Word) could ever participate in such a system? The truth is this: those who are even allowed to enter high level positions in Jewish-controlled tech companies must be blessed by the kings of the world (who btw are Jewish). It is that simple. If Mayer is deemed one who will act in the interest of elitist Jews, she indeed will be blessed, and allowed to enter such a position in the first place. Just how many true Bible-believing Christians can you name who are running Jewish-run (and blessed) companies like Google, Microsoft, Wikipedia and others like them? I can think of none off the top of my head! 

According to Christopher Chantrill, in his essay "Yahoo's Marissa Mayer Wants to Dominate," humanity has a choice to make:
"Perhaps it's time to think about a new way to deal with the dominating power of system.  Maybe what we need to do is empower people so that in their families and neighborhoods and associations, they can build not a system to fight the other systems, but an organism of cooperation and goodwill as a defense against all systems.  The idea is that people can decide to join Marissa Mayer's high-powered Yahoo, if they want, or Joanna Weiss's feminist sisterhood.  Or they can decide that children and family are more important than the next big thing in social media or political activism and choose a low-powered life instead."
Sadly, my prediction is that the yuppie slaves will just passively accept Mayer's Jewish style model of corporate dictatorship. Even if she proclaims herself to be a Lutheran, she behaves as a Jewish feminist elitist who desires to take over your life and your soul!