The Holy Bible - God's Word or just Jewish propaganda?

I ran across this essay called "The Enemy Amongst Us" by Yukon Jack published in VT (Veterans Today) and have decided to provide an open response to it. I must admit that VT is a publication that I highly respect. Further, I must state that Yukon Jack makes some critical points of "truth" in his essay. However, there are some critical statements that he makes which deserve a response.

Below, I will post quoted portions of what Jack wrote in "bold" print, and then I will provide my response in "standard" ink print. 

"Jews and Christians, live amongst us and have corrupted society with their fictional god and authority. The Jews have convinced most gentiles the authenticity of their book and have enslaved almost the entire planet. Because of the dominance of Christianity, humanity is doomed to total enslavement. It is no longer just a Jew problem, the entire population is infected with authoritarian memes because of Bible indoctrination. Welcome to Judeo-Christian hell."

There are some definite truths to what Jack is saying. "Welcome to Judeo-Christian hell" is a statement of absolute truth! I agree! One can read "Why Muslims are persecuting Christians in the Middle East" to confirm that we are indeed living in a "Judeo-Christian hell" where MANY (self-proclaiming) Judaizing Christians behave as Jews and thereby reap the same curses that Jews have had over thousands of years. And yes, those curses are either hellish, or will eventually lead to hell...one or the other or both!

And as Jack states, this "Judeo-Christian hell" is dooming humanity to total enslavement! Absolute truth! 70+ Million Americans (alone) or 1/4 of the ENTIRE American population claims to be a Judeo-Christian. That is a staggering figure indeed, and the reason why America is in the state it is in today. I contend that if even 1/4 of the American population were "true Christians," America would be a far better place to live. The number of Christians is not the problem. 1/4 of an entire population is well more than enough for a "truly Christian" population to make huge "positive" differences. However, when Christians behave in the manner of a Jew, then we can expect a very different outcome...one that is NOT good!

The error in Jack's statement, is that he implies that the Bible is merely a Jewish publication, rather than the inerrant Word of God. More on that point below.

Deranged Christians think the path to freedom is through submission to the Jew Bible. At least the Jews openly admit that gentiles are their goyim slaves. The purpose of the Bible is to enslave, that is the clear intent of the authors. How is it that you will find freedom when you indoctrinate slavery? All Christians are reading an evil book that corrupts the mind, there is no such thing as a ‘good’ Christian unless you think being an obedient slave is good.

Yes, religions (of nearly all varieties) are largely corrupted. I agree. Yet, in order to understand God, we must be cognizant of the differences between God's Word and "religion." There is a huge difference. To use a metaphor, God's Word is like the Roman pillars which remain standing at various historic sites in Rome, Greece, Jordan, and throughout the ancient Roman Empire. These pillars have stood the test of time, and have prevailed. And, "religions" (in general) are like the urban buildings that we see in the modern cities of today. These buildings stand for 20 to 100 years, but then erode away due to their inability to stand the test of time and of nature's forces. Of course, some of the older religions have been around for much longer than that, but of those (like Catholicism), most have grown sour (and lukewarm) due to perverted doctrine.And, as God indicates in Revelation, He will vomit the lukewarm Christians out of His Kingdom:

¹⁶ So because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of My mouth. (Revelation 3:16 NASB)

The Bible is the inerrant Word of God. It is only through God's gift of grace that any of us have the faith to believe this fact. Such is Godly "truth," but not the "truth" of the world. 

¹⁶ All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; (2 Timothy 3:16 NASB)

The above verse is out of the "Greek" (not Jewish) New Testament. The New Testament and the (Jewish) Old Testament combine to form the "Holy Bible." All of the Bible is God's Word.

Yet, given Jack's statements in his essay, it is evident; however, that the Bible is "foolishness" to him. Further, he believes that those who believe in it, are "suckers" and "fools." What does the Bible tell us about that phenomenon?

¹⁴ But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised. ¹⁵ But he who is spiritual appraises all things, yet he himself is appraised by no one. (1 Corinthians 2:14-15 NASB)

Further, Jack contends that the Jews wrote the Bible to enslave the goyim. In truth, the Bible was written to enslave ALL of us! But, enslave to whom? Jesus. That's who! And, being a slave to Jesus is what frees us from the wicked world. Click on this hyperlink to learn what it means to "live free in Christ." Much of what you need to know is toward the end of this essay. Go read it! Those who do not bother to read that essay will remain confused by my statement, that being Jesus' slave is what, in reality, frees us from the world! Libertarians are even more perplexed by such a seemingly irrational statement! Yet, those who think they are closer to "the truth" are invariably, farther from it! (Yet another paradox!)

²² Professing to be wise, they became fools, (Romans 1:22 NASB)

Libertarians do appear (by worldly standard) to be wiser than the average Zombie (neocon/neolib). Yet, most "wise" people are not aware of what Romans 1:22 says. The point of Romans 1:22 is that those who are extraordinary intelligent are often extraordinarily ignorant in the eyes of God? Why? Because God HATES intellectual arrogance! The implication is, "intellectual arrogance is ignorance!" Again, many Libertarians (and "free thinkers") will be perplexed by such a statement! 

Christians demand you submit to their god but their god is a fiction, a meme, and idea the brain invented. No man has authority over another, never did, never will because humans are free beings and always have been.

This statement is Jack's blatant denial of the God in Heaven, as well as His Son Jesus and the Holy Spirit. In my assessment, Jack is a non-believing Libertarian. A good essay for him (and those who believe as he does) to read is: "Why Libertarian philosophy & psychology cannot save you!" Read it. I've written many blog entries so there is no need to repeat what I've said previously. 

What Jack needs to realize is that Jews (who worship the "god" of *this* world - Satan) control Christian "religions." It is they who have hijacked the Christian doctrine in the churches, and it is the Jewish controllers who have pushed "Judeo-Christianity" on Americans and the world at large. And because of that, this is the reason we are all living in a "Judeo-Christian hell" as Jack refers to in his essay. 

There is a huge difference between the Judeo-Christian interpretation of the Bible, and what the Bible actually means by God's true intent. 

So Christian why aren’t you signing on to Obamacare? Why are you not submitting to Obama’s authority over you? According to your book God put the authorities in charge. You seem to be lacking faith in the authorities these days. Looks to me like your lie has caught up to you and is now biting you in your ass. 

No, I don't want Obamacare, nor will I submit to anything his administration does that is not of God's Word. I agree with Jack's point there. And to his credit, too many Christians submit to wickedness and corruption, and that is why America is where she is today...a crack whore dying of AIDS. I get it! 

However, the Bible does state that we are to submit to authority, when and only when the authorities are doing work that is ordained by God. A God-ordained government has a relatively narrow scope of responsibilities, and today, it is evident that the government is far over-reaching, and doing well more than that which God ordains in His Word. 

Here again, I have already written about Romans 13, and what a God-ordained government should look like. The essay to read is: "Romans 13 – The Appropriate Role of Government." 

In short, a God-ordained government has the right to take life (as a punishment), to enforce justice, to maintain law and order, and to levy taxes (i.e., to take a "reasonable" amount of money to fund the former functions and to pay their own "reasonable" wages in order to carry out these God-ordained functions). And, that is it. That is the true model for a "smaller government." The only people who should "fear" government are "evil doers." Why? Because, the government (who behaves in a "God-ordained" manner) punishes the wicked, NOT the righteous people, which is exactly what the American government has been doing for a long time. Jack cites this phenomenon in his essay, and for that, I agree with his points.

For those who think like Jack, you may think "faith" is not rational, and that it is the way of the fool. If you believe this way, then I invite you to read "Who is a real Christian? " It is here, that I describe matters of "faith" in alignment to what Scripture says. By reading this, you just might see that there is far more to "faith" than foolishness or irrationality. "Might" is the operative word!

Understanding the "Jewish problem" can either be your best friend or your worst enemy. The reason for this phenomenon is due to the fact that this issue is the most critical for understanding, because there is no better tool of deception that I can think of! There is no more potent way for Jews to conduct their "evil" behind the cloak of righteousness than to push the idea that it is "of the Lord" to support the actions of "Jews" and to support the apostate nation of "Israel" (i.e., the one formed in 1948)! That allows conniving Jews at the top to co-opt a very large population (who are "well-meaning" people) to support their "evil" works. 

On the other hand, those who reject the lies of the Jews hijacking of Christianity, have the potential of falling into the other pit. Satan loves that too! People who are wise enough to see through the Jews' lies, then associate Jews with corrupt Christianity, and thereby reject the Bible (God's Word) as well! The fault here is NOT Jack's denunciation of "religion," it is his denunciation of God's Word, which is a severe and dangerous trap to fall into. This underlined statement serves as the primary value of this entire blog entry. This is the trap, that I fear is the one which will ensnare even the brightest (Libertarian-minded) people out there! Reread Romans 1:22 (as I posted above)! 

Be well aware that Satan is the central figure here. Today, the Jews are his Number 1 agents. They rejected Jesus, and so God is allowing them to have their hay day...to have the world! The Jews chose "mammon" (money) & the world over Jesus. That's what they now have. Jews arrogantly behave as if they are still living in the Old Covenant. They continue to enslave the goyim, which God would have allowed in the Old Covenant. Yet, even with all of God's favoritism of the Jews at that time, He was very dissatisfied with the behavior of the Jews, who were NOT living according to the true nature of God. That was evident since the times of Moses and since God brought the Jews out of Egypt. The Jews grew very decadent and wicked! The Old Testament (& the New Testament) provides full evidence of that fact. That is why God saw the need to send His Son Jesus. He intended to show the Jews how to live in a Godly manner, so that the Jews could then serve as a "light" unto the goyim! However, that did NOT happen. The Jews rejected Christ and crucified His body. At that point, God destroyed the Old Covenant, and brought in a new one to the goyim. 70 AD marks the point where God would remove the Old Covenant from the Jews, and that is when He destroyed their place of worship! Amazingly, God has not allowed Jews to rebuild a temple in it's place! Most certainly, Jews have the military power and means to rebuild the temple, but for some mysterious reason, a rebuilt temple has not yet occurred. Jews can run the entire world, but they cannot even have a small little temple in the Old City of Jerusalem! Truly amazing! My only conclusion to such a phenomenon is that God is allowing Jews the right (in today's world) to run the world, but He is NOT allowing them the satisfaction of His endorsement of their Christ-hating religion which is Judaism!

In summary, I urge well-meaning "truthers" to re-examine their position that the Bible is merely Jewish propaganda. Even though there are many parallel concepts between the Old Testament and the New Testament, I suggest that unbelievers start off by reading the New Testament, because that is the one which speaks directly to the goyim of today. Also, I've written a book on Bible interpretation, which is Part 1 (or 30%) of this book. The other 70% of it covers survival topics, prepper topics, computer security, physical security, and a number of other topics. Those who read the Bible need to understand context. And sadly, the "religions" and "churches" out there do a poor job of it. The proof of this statement is in the pudding! Look at America today. Jack eloquently made that point reference the damage that Christian "religions" have inflicted in America! Remember, however, that the Bible (God's Word) is everlasting and will never die (ref: Matthew 24:35).

³⁵ Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will not pass away. (Matthew 24:35 NASB)

Yet, "religions" are now on their death bed! Don't allow your soul to go with them! 

Jewish rudeness

It is a well-known fact that Jews are among the rudest people in the world. The Jews I met and dealt with when I was over in Israel (as well as Jews right here in America) are proud of that fact. Many Americans (particularly those living in rural areas), may not fully understand what I am talking about. Yet, the truth is, so many Americans behave in a similar manner to Jews, because the Jews are the ones running (and brainwashing) the people of America! The rudeness that we have witnessed for a number of years among our young people has escalated, and that is due to the promotion of "rude" behavior in our Jewish-produced Hollywood films (movies & TV).

My point is this: Americans are by and large unaware of *why* they are behaving as they are! Hence the term - the "Ugly American." Read the hyperlink to this term. The behaviors which have molded the behaviors of the "Ugly American" are really "Jewish" in origin. Jewish style rudeness sits at the top of the pyramid and rolls down the hill just like a pile of dung! When I was in the military, the proverbial "Schumer" rolls *down* the hill was a common expression. Jews influencing the ignorant goyim is literal truth! 

If anyone reading this blog entry has ever lived in or been to an urban Jewish community, you will know that these people simply walk into you, they rarely if ever say "Excuse me" or "Pardon me." They just walk right through "you" as if they are entitled to all the space around them! I have also noticed that this occurs in many wealthy Jewish-American communities as well. Many Jews who are reading this entry will say that such behavior is "assertive" behavior. I will disagree and state that such behavior is absolute "rudeness" with a core premise of absolute "selfishness" ...i.e, "me, me, and me!" Any Jew who would enter into a so-called "tough" neighborhood (e.g., Southeast D.C., Bronx, N.Y., South-central L.A., etc.) would be in for a rude (pardon the pun) awakening! People who live in "tough" neighborhoods have learned politeness and respect for the most part. Hollywood movies love to depict people in these areas as "rude," but that is not the reality. People who live in the tough areas often behave with more respect towards others, and as such, polite behavior serves as a means of survival. Unfortunately, rude Jews in the wealthier parts of town rarely, if ever, have to pay the price for their rude behavior, and so their behavior proliferates. 

Consider the points by a Jewish mother who is embarrassed by her people's behavior. Her points are revealing. A link to her blog entry is sourced at the end of her quote:

"We spent our sabbatical year in Israel in 07-08. It was a fabulous experience. I agree with most of the observations/comments above. For me, the most striking thing was the bad behaviour of the children AND the adults who had obviously been parented in a similar manner. Don’t get me wrong. My children also misbehave, but the difference is that, when they do, I notice, I care and I act. Many Israeli parents do not notice, care or act. They are raising another generation of rude, spoiled children. I had visited Israel 3 times before our sabbatical year and, of course, I noticed and experienced the rude behaviour of both adults and children. However, over the course of the year, this aspect of Israeli culture REALLY began to wear on me. It was embarrassing, as a Jew, to imagine what non-Jewish tourists thought of “us” as Jews. They are not just seeing rude Israelis, they are seeing rude Jews. Many of the Israelis that I spent time with while in Israel were also embarrassed by the behaviour of their fellow Israelis and their children. The difference, in almost every case, was that the people I spent time with – family and friends – had themselves lived in Canada or the US.

I should state again, because this reads as very negative. We loved our time in Israel and look forward to future vacations there. And to be sure, there are things that Israeli parents probably do a better job of than North American parents." (Source: Hannah Katzman; "In Defense of Israeli Rudeness".)

"Trudy" (the person who left wrote the above comment) has every reason to be ashamed of the behavior demonstrated not only by "Israelis" but by "Jews" of all nationalities. The problem of Jewish rudeness is a much wider problem and at least she understands that point. What she may not understand is how Jewish rudeness is also afflicting (i.e., influencing) a HUGE population of goyim in American (and elsewhere)! 

A Jewish apologist by the name "Mimi" responds with her justification for the rude behavior of Jewish (and Israeli) people:

"Trudy’s comments about Israeli behavior are unfortunately accurate. By American/Canadian lights, there is no culture of politeness here – no customer service – lots of confrontation.

On the other hand, it’s necessary not to care what outsiders might think if Israel is to survive in an anti-Semitic, anti-Israel world....

My life experience is different. I’ve sat in buses wondering if I’ll make it to my destination, or if my destiny will be to get blown up by a suicide bomber in the next few minutes. My children have attended funerals of kids their own ages, victims of terror. I look at my precious little grandchildren and pray that peace will come before they reach army age.

If there’s one thing rude Israeli culture has taught me, it’s that it takes assertiveness to survive.

So yes, Israelis are missing an essential element in that which lubricates social relations. It hurts us here and abroad. I’m perfectly willing to own that many of us need to be educated in manners, consideration, trust and trustworthiness.
But that hard, assertive core keeps us alive. No apologies for that."
(Source: Hannah Katzman; "In Defense of Israeli Rudeness".)

"Mimi" justifies Jewish rudeness and refers to such behavior as "assertiveness!" To reiterate what I said above, "assertiveness" is not the rudeness we see among Jews. Jewish rudeness is better classified as "aggressiveness." The Jews who run the world, use aggression at the very top, and that is what they portray in mass media (via Jewish-run Hollywood) as "strength." 

"Assertiveness" on the other hand, is what most Jews lack. Assertive people are a minority in our culture. Assertive people say "pardon me" or "excuse me." Such types do NOT view "politeness" as "weakness." They are polite and they exude a sense of "inner strength" not commonly seen among rude Jews. They speak in a relaxed tone of voice, but their statements are direct, brief, and succinct. If a rude Jew walks abruptly into them at the market, they might be apt to make a direct statement such as "How about excusing yourself!" or a similar statement. In my experience, I have found that the rudest Jews are also most fearful of making direct statements of what they really want. In other words, these type of people are afraid to tell "you" what they really think! Is not that the true mark of cowardice?

Therefore, next time a "rude" Jew expresses their pride of how "rude" and "aggressive" they are, such a statement should be indicative of just how much of a coward they really are! 

Lastly, I should also mention another point Mimi made excusing Jewish rudeness. That is, Jews are rude by the mere necessity that the world hates them and are largely "antisemitic." Therefore, the thinking is this: If the world hates Jews, then the Jew must become that much ruder and more aggressive to preserve their position in the world. To that, I must state that if Jews would have accepted Jesus as their Christ and Messiah, they would be able to come to God (ref to John 14:6). Yet, because Jews rejected Christ, they cannot know God or even follow His Commandments. The Jews of today are the perfect example of this. Those who ignore God's Commandments go against the grain of His natural law, and therefore, the Jews who do so will naturally be hated by the people of the world. What comes around, goes around! 

The only way for Jews to reverse this trend, so that they will not feel the need to be "rude" and "aggressive" is to accept Jesus. If that ever happens, only then will Jews be able to come to and know God. Only then will they be able to follow His Commandments and natural law. If Jews were to do that, it would be metaphysically impossible for the people of the world to hate them! Now that, my friends, would be "true strength!" 

Jerome Corsi stating Jews are the problem, but...

I just wanted to bang out a quick blog entry on Jerome Corsi who is best known for his book regarding the Obama Birth Certificate debacle. And to Corsi's credit, no doubt he is absolutely correct on this point, and perhaps on many other points (or issues) as well. I see him as a useful source of information, but there is a point he makes which will lead so many of his readers/followers off of a steep cliff (spiritually)!

Sandy Rios (of the American Family Association) interviewed Corsi, and here is his statement. I will offer a brief explanation below:

Rios, who earlier asserted that secular Jews often “turn out to be the worst enemies of the country,” asked Corsi about the “powerful Jewish forces behind the ACLU.” Corsi said that such forces are trying to make America “abandon the Judeo-Christian tradition” and therefore abandoning “values that are fundamental lynchpins of our freedom.”

Rios: I know that there are powerful Jewish forces behind the ACLU; can you just say a word about that very briefly, what’s that all about?

Corsi: There has been a real union between Jews in America and the Democratic Party ever since President Truman agreed with the partition of Palestine and created the state of Israel in 1948 at the UN. But my book is arguing for a Judeo-Christian faith, which is the heart of America. We cannot abandon the Judeo-Christian tradition. If we do we are abandoning our whole values that are fundamental lynchpins of our freedom. (Source: "Corsi and Rios Explain How Evolution, the ACLU and 'Powerful Jewish Forces' Will Destroy America")

In essence, Corsi is making a truthful statement and then following that statement with information that is total nonsense. "A", "B", and "C" are true, and so therefore it follows that "D" must also be true. That is the line of logic that Corsi uses. 

It is true that Jews want to destroy Christianity (I will add that Jews want to destroy "genuine" Christianity, not Judeo Christianity). It is true that there is a "real union" between Jews in America and the Democratic Party (BOTH parties in reality are Jewish-controlled I will add) since Truman (and well before that I will add), and it is also true that "Judeo-Christianity" is at the heart of American culture.  Therefore (as Corsi asserts), America must cling even tighter to its Judeo Christian roots, which are (supposedly) at the core of American freedom and prosperity.

This is where Corsi and I must part ways. Judeo (or "Jewish") Christianity has not made America a "great country" however the term "great" can be defined. Yet, it is possible to assert that it did make America "materialistically prosperous." On that point, I will agree! America is materially prosperous because we have adopted the "mammon-worshiping" ways of the Jew which have been the controlling force of America pretty much since it's inception. 

Yet, with all the material prosperity that America has seen, it is also this aspect which is leading this country towards a potential catastrophic downfall much like that which was witnessed in 5th century Rome, the Greek and Persian Empires, and Babylon! Where then is the track record to prove that Judeo Christianity is the answer to greatness?

The answer to my rhetorical question is this: Those who live and behave as Jews are incapable of making the world one which runs in accordance to God's Word. Instead, what we have is a world full of wars, violence, and division rife with a mountain of God's curses upon this land which is in dire need of repentance and healing! That's what we now have!

Further discussion of the dangers of Judaizing can be found in my other blog entry called "Why Muslims are persecuting Christians in the Middle East". Please read it as well, in order to better discern the difference between genuine and fake Christianity! The life of your soul could well depend upon the information in that blog entry (as well as this one)!

Rios: I know that there are powerful Jewish forces behind the ACLU; can you just say a word about that very briefly, what’s that all about?

Corsi: There has been a real union between Jews in America and the Democratic Party ever since President Truman agreed with the partition of Palestine and created the state of Israel in 1948 at the UN. But my book is arguing for a Judeo-Christian faith, which is the heart of America. We cannot abandon the Judeo-Christian tradition. If we do we are abandoning our whole values that are fundamental lynchpins of our freedom. - See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/corsi-and-rios-explain-how-evolution-aclu-and-powerful-jewish-forces-will-destroy-america#sthash.l59MCCfS.

Rios: I know that there are powerful Jewish forces behind the ACLU; can you just say a word about that very briefly, what’s that all about?

Corsi: There has been a real union between Jews in America and the Democratic Party ever since President Truman agreed with the partition of Palestine and created the state of Israel in 1948 at the UN. But my book is arguing for a Judeo-Christian faith, which is the heart of America. We cannot abandon the Judeo-Christian tradition. If we do we are abandoning our whole values that are fundamental lynchpins of our freedom. - See more at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/corsi-and-rios-explain-how-evolution-aclu-and-powerful-jewish-forces-will-destroy-america#sthash.l59MCCfS

What on earth does it mean to be a "conservative?"

Finally, I decided to do a blog entry on what it means to be a "conservative." While I rarely use this term, it is what I most definitely consider myself to be. Some, if not many, aspects of what I believe fall within the lines of what a "libertarian" would believe, and when it comes to theology, my beliefs most definitely fall into the category of what some might define as being very orthodox or "conservative." 

However, my brand of "conservatism" differs rather greatly from the "All American" style of "neo-conservatism" that I have witnessed out on the internet and on Twitter. Being a city slicker myself, it is no wonder why my thinking differs from the "All American" view of what "conservatism" should be! The funny pic (above) depicts the cynical view of the average "All American conservative" often held by urbanites! The image of overweight, tough redneck types who cling to their Bibles & guns are legendary not only for American urbanites, but also for urban Europeans and others from around the world. And to be fair, rednecks are indeed some of the best riflemen in the world! I know this because of my previous military experience serving in an elite unit. Most of the guys that could shoot really well, were from the rural areas of like West Virginia, Arkansas, or Texas. The guys from the inner cities of NYC, LA, or DC were typically less skilled in the art of marksmanship. That was just my personal observation, not necessarily a fact!

Back to my point. So what is "conservative" and what is not? Let's start with the more commonly held public views or premises that are often tacitly pushed via Jewish-run mainstream media (MSM). 

The common view of the American Conservative:

1. Hates "big government" and claims to want smaller government. 
2. Is in favor of private gun ownership and the right to personal self-defense. 
3. Loves prosperity and favors private ownership rights (large house, car, etc).
4. Hates Birckenstocks and views them as the type of shoes that only neo-Liberals and hippies should be wearing. 
5. Some claim to be Christians, and of those who do, are typically Judeo Zionist Christians. Other conservatives are atheists or agnostics, and essentially believe that what they have was through their own work and efforts.
6. Are into hunting (both for food and for sport), and love to eat steak or potatoes. Those who are vegetarians or who are into "juicing" are looked upon as possibly being a "homosexual."
7. Claim to be against homosexual lifestyle, abortion, pornography, and illicit drugs.

While plenty more points could be added to the list above, I believe that many "All American" conservatives will likely agree with the list I compiled above. Yet, as a "conservative" myself, I can agree marginally with some of the points above. I will address each of the numbered points above with what I believe to be the pros/cons of each. 

Point #1: Hates "big government" and claims to want smaller government. 

Those of the libertarian mindset say they want smaller government, and that is exactly what they want... significantly smaller government. Yet, a very large contingent of neo-conservatives are in love with the Big Jewish-run and owned wars in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. They have bought into the lie that if we defeat "Christian-hating" Muslims "over there," we will not have to "fight them on our own soil!" The alleged "threat" of Muslims taking over America has been pushed hard in the media, and has also seen increased coverage in many mainline "alternative truther" news outlets. 

For certain, I do not want to see Muslims taking over America, nor do I want to ever see laws that would mandate that we all must worship Allah! Yet, with such a large contingent of "Judeo Christians" (70 Million+) in America, I could easily imagine the Jewish elites manipulating and staging a situation where Muslims do gain significant political power in America. After all, it is in the interest of the Jews running America to significantly destroy the "identity" of a "white Christian" America. Further, elitist Jews see that it is necessary to maintain a firm grip among Judeo Christians, and to accomplish such a feat, it is necessary to have the average Judeo Christian living in a constant state of "fear"...i.e., the fear of "boogeymen" such as the "evil" Muslims who are supposedly aiming to take over America! What better than for Jews to engage their Christian supporters in taking active participation in their Jewish-run crimes against humanity (i.e. the "big wars" in Iraq, etc), doing the "dirty work" so that Jews can claim plausible deniability for any blood that is shed?

Therefore, so many neo-con Judeo Christians are going to claim they are "conservative," but they are the very ones who have cried out to "big government" (run by their Jewish masters) to "save them" from those "evil" Muslims and it is these people who have NOT been conservative at all with my tax dollars (or yours)! Can anyone detect hypocrisy?

Point #2: Is in favor of private gun ownership and the right to personal self-defense. 

On this point, I can agree with many of the chief tenants about private gun ownership, and right to self defense. 

Yet, many neo-con conservatives who claim to be "pro-Corporation" fail to realize that it is the big corporations who are in full cahoots with the Jewish-run system to disarm the American public. That point is made in my previous blog entry called "Gun buyback in Van Nuys Masonic Temple." Many "conservatives" and "libertarians" would accuse me of being "liberal" because I speak negatively about large Corporations. Many of them believe that large corporations are merely a spinoff of the so-called "free market." Argue what you may, but I will note that most of today's corporations are Jewish-run, owned, or at the very least -- manipulated! And as Mussolini indicated, the merger of corporations and government yield fascism. 

Point #3: Loves prosperity and favors private ownership rights (large house, car, etc).

Many, but not all, conservatives seem to favor the so-called "American Dream" which is to get married, to have kids (two or three is common), to buy that nice large 4 bedroom house, and to have two or three sedans or SUV's parked out front. Those who live in large urban areas are going to need a large income to support this level or standard of living, and in 2013, there are fewer people/families that can afford this type of living accommodation than just a few years earlier. Yet, many conservatives, even today, pride themselves on still maintaining the above arbitrary standard of the "American Dream." 

In my view, even if one can afford the above, why not consider breaking the "American Dream" standard arbitrarily pushed by Jewish elites and keep more of the money that you have earned over the years where it belongs...in your pocket! While many conservatives believe that obtaining the "American Dream" is the ultimate "conservative goal," I argue just how conservative such a goal really is! 

What is "conservative" about obtaining a leveraged 30 year mortgage on a $1 Million to $2 Million dollar house, which is common for many nicer homes in larger urban areas? What is conservative about paying property taxes which amount to that which would be approximately the same as the monthly rent of any apartment in the same general location? The point I am making is that many so-called "conservatives" spend way more money than they need to! 

In my view, a true conservative lives beneath the level of comfort mandated by that which the Jewish elite have defined as the "American Dream." It is they who have told us lemmings what we should want, and what we should not want! So many conservatives are drinking their Koolaid, and if the Jewish banksters ever decide to pull the carpet out from beneath our feet, indeed there will be many very poor conservatives living in nice homes and nice cars in their parking lot, but with no money to fuel them, and no money or means to even feed themselves or their families! 

Point #4: Hates Birckenstocks and views them as the type of shoes that only neo-Liberals and hippies should be wearing. 

There are Jewish run companies often in trendy parts of town that allow their employees to dress casually, but who are opposed to them wearing Birckenstock sandals. A friend of mine worked for a medium-sized Jewish-owned company, and she told me that "Birckenstocks" were explicitly banned in the employee handbook. Yet, the employees there would wear nearly any other type of sandals or flip flops, and those were permitted. 

By the way, the CFO was a Jew, and he was the one who was responsible for this policy. Jews who are "mammon" or "money" oriented have done what they can to make "Birkenstocks" (or "Jesus sandals") uncool or not trendy! The common perception is that only liberal hippies wear them. Even Alex Jones (aka Alex Jonestein) makes fun of them on his popular radio show!

It is my contention that Jews have a natural hatred of nearly anything that even remotely reminds them of Jesus! Thus, if you live an area with a high Jewish population, and you want to irritate them, wear Birkenstocks! It will remind them of who they crucified 2000 years ago! 

While I do not wear Birkenstocks myself, I'm thinking that it might be a good time to start doing so! From all that I am told, they are extremely comfortable sandals, which are great for long distance urban walking. OBTW, most rich Jews don't like to walk too far...that is for the poor goyim! They would rather race around in their BMW's, Mercedes, or Rolls Royces!

Point #5: Some claim to be Christians, and of those who do, are typically Judeo Zionist Christians. Other conservatives are atheists or agnostics, and essentially believe that what they have was through their own work and efforts. 

As Rev. Jerry Falwell stated, there are over 70 Million+ Zionist Judeo Christians living in America. And, I would say a mass majority of them consider themselves to be "conservatives." However, as I will contend, their brand of Christianity is anything but "conservative." Their Biblical interpretation is often "legalistic" which falls into the liberal category of theology, and their desire for "big government" support of big Jewish wars (like the Iraq war) are anything but conservative. Judeo Christians, by and large, are huge supporters of big government, even though they hypocritically proclaim a desire for "small government!" See the funny pic (above)!

For those wanting more information on the liberal aspects of Judeo Christianity, you need to read "Why Muslims are persecuting Christians in the Middle East." You also should read some of my other previous blog entries which are tagged under the term "Zionism" or "Eschatology." 

As for those of you in the more "rational" conservative camp -- i.e., those of you who are "libertarians," I can agree a good bit more of what you believe, but there are things that you folks are also neglecting. Please read this entry entitled "Why Libertarian philosophy & psychology cannot save you!" This one is a critical read with a number of complex points which differentiate between libertarian truth and Biblical truth. While the intended audience is atheist libertarians, I am actually targeting atheists or agnostics of all varieties.

Point #6: Are into hunting (both for food and for sport), and love to eat steak or potatoes. Those who are vegetarians or who are into "juicing" are looked upon as possibly being a "homosexual." 

I suppose we can all thank people like the legendary Rocker Ted Nugent for this one! The concept that hunting and "meat eating" are the only pathway to becoming a true conservative. In my book, I point out that hunting is in accordance to Scripture; however, I make the point that the Bible only condones hunting for food, not for sport! Yet, Ted Nugent (and many others like him) believe that hunting for sport is also a "good thing." In my book, I differentiate between the two...one being in accordance to Scripture while the other is not. I also express my appreciation of animals as a part of God's creation which we are to love and respect when are not looking for meat to eat. That blog entry is called "What squirrels can teach the rest of us about life and about survival."

Also, if one views the funny pic (above), notice just how fat that lady is! Correct me if I am wrong, but my perception is that there are a lot of rural folk who have the same or similar body type. I should mention that there are a lot of her body type in the urban Jewish communities as well! For those that do not know, eating meat is very common among Jewish communities. They eat tons of it, and their obese body types are the evidence to prove that fact! 

Eating meat is fine as long as it is done in very "conservative" amounts! Notice the word "conservative" is often totally ignored by a high percentage of so-called "conservative" Americans! Some people eat meat nearly every day or every night for dinner! Those who do that, can and will eventually become obese. 

Once again, American conservatives who pride themselves on their hunting prowess, are not very "conservative" when it comes to the number of animals that they eat in a year! It is this very point that I make to depict just how "out of balance" many Americans are in their consumption of food. Is there anything conservative Americans can ever do that is in balance? 

How about eating meat once per week and then juicing on another day, and then eating some vegetables on yet another? Now that would actually be conservative! You would be using resources in balance, and I promise you that you would NOT look like the fat lady in the funny pic (above)! That is my promise to anyone who engages in genuine "conservative" dietary habits. 

Please note, that I am not judging you on what you eat. I am simply suggesting a more "conservative" dietary plan that is more balanced and more conservative! Those who eat less are more conservative than those who engage in gluttony! And for that, the Bible has a few harsh words to say on that topic.

¹⁹ whose end is destruction, whose god is their appetite, and whose glory is in their shame, who set their minds on earthly things. (Philippians 3:19; NASB)

²⁰ Do not be with heavy drinkers of wine,
Or with gluttonous eaters of meat; (Proverbs 23:20; NASB)

³¹ Whether, then, you eat or drink or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. (1 Corinthians 10:31; NASB)

Therefore, my admonition is to become a true conservative and eat less, and to eat in a more balanced manner. You will be glad you ever did!

Point #7: Claim to be against homosexual lifestyle, abortion, pornography, and illicit drugs. 

I agree with the tenants of point #7, as many Christians do. However, there are some Christians who claim that homosexuality can be combined with living in accordance to God's Word. So-called "homosexual Christians" are one type who proclaim this, and I refuted their claim in a previous blog entry called ""One can be "gay" & Jewish, but not "gay" & Christian"" In this entry, I provide evidence right out of the Bible which depicts why the homosexual lifestyle and Biblical living cannot go together. 

It appears that many Zionist Judeo Christians and reformist ones (like myself) can agree on many of the tenants of point #7. Therefore, I will not go to exhaustive length regarding this one. However, that said, we should also note the hypocrisy of (some) neocons at the higher levels who participated in homosexual orgies at Bohemian Grove (watch the Alex Jones film). Here again, there are SOME so-called "conservatives" who claim to be against homosexuality, but then engage in it themselves. 

Conclusion:

Hopefully, this blog entries adds some clarity to the term -- "Conservative." In my view, a conservative is one who truly does conserve. He/she lives beneath the comfort level of that which the Jewish elites have set as "the standard" of what the "American Dream" should be. Remember, the Jewish elites want you to be poor. They want the average American to make and save less money, but to spend MORE of their hard-earned money. They have brainwashed Americans to want the big house, or expensive car, which is the very reason why so many Americans are NOT free! 

You only become a conservative when you "break the chains" of Jewish mind-control! Those who would like to learn how to become a true conservative (that actually does conserve), read my ENTIRE blog, and buy and read my book on survival preparation.

It is there that you will learn to get more out of life with less!

Vermont & New Hampshire listed as least religious states in America

Yahoo News put out an short essay today called "The Most Religious State is ..." and I just had to see what this one would read like. My thoughful Twitter follower - La Culinary Composer, pointed this one out to me figuring that it would capture my attention.

The essay summarizes its findings and offers a brief definition of the term - "very religious":

"Mississippi holds onto its title as most religious U.S. state, with 58 percent of its residents saying they are very religious, according to a Gallup poll released Wednesday (Feb. 13).

The least religious state? Vermont.

About 40 percent of Americans said they were "very religious," meaning religion is an important part of their daily life and that they attend religious services every week or nearly every week. Some 31 percent indicated they were nonreligious, or that religion wasn't an important part of their daily life and they seldom or never attend such services."

And, here were the rankings for Top-10 "most religious" and Top-10 "least religious" states:

Top 10 most religious states

• Mississippi: 58 percent are very religious
• Utah: 56 percent
• Alabama: 56 percent
• Louisiana: 53 percent
• Arkansas: 52 percent
• South Carolina: 52 percent
• Tennessee: 50 percent
• North Carolina: 50 percent
• Georgia: 48 percent
• Oklahoma: 48 percent

Bottom 10 (least religious states)

• Vermont: 19 percent are very religious
• New Hampshire: 23 percent
• Maine: 24 percent
• Massachusetts: 27 percent
• Oregon: 29 percent
• Rhode Island: 29 percent
• District of Columbia: 30 percent
• Washington (tie): 31 percent
• Connecticut (tie): 31 percent
• Alaska (tie): 31 percent
• Hawaii (tie): 31 percent
• Nevada (tie): 31 percent

Of these findings, I found the Top-10 "most religious" states to be as expected. However, the Top-10 "least religious" states tossed a curve confirming some of my previous suspicions, which I've held for a long time. And that is, Vermont and New Hampshire are considered to be the "least religious" states in the entire United States!


I fully understand that being "religious" is not a full indicator of spiritual maturity, and as my grandmother used to say, "We can all be religious about going to the bathroom!" True spirituality delves beyond the bounds of "religion" alone, and I fully understand that point. 


On the other hand, I know that states like Vermont and New Hampshire have a higher percentage of Libertarians, and those who "love freedom." After all, New Hampshire has had its motto - "Live free or die!" since 1945. New Hampshire is also known for its "Free State Project" which encourages like-minded "freedom lovers" to move there and to enjoy lower taxes and other benefits. All of this sounds great.


However, for all of the good coming out of states like Vermont and New Hampshire, I also know that Libertarianism is more than just a philosophy, it has likely also become a "god" for some. There are a fair number of those in the Liberty movement that could care less about God, as some of them are atheists or agnostics. They believe the Bible is full of useless nonsense. 


Two months ago, I wrote a blog entry called - "Why Libertarian Philosophy & Psychology cannot save you!" In this piece, I give a detailed exegesis of the pros/cons of Libertarian philosophy, and just why Libertarianism (alone) cannot save you. I further emphasis the critical importance of fearing God and acting in accordance to His Word. That blog entry serves as a critical tangent to the one you are now reading. Please read it. 


In summary, Vermont and New Hampshire may be a "freedom lover's" paradise, but the fact that religion is sneered upon, is at the very least, a strong indicator that God and His Word - The Holy Bible, are also not regarded or respected. Now I do know there are exceptions to what the statistics indicate, and there are a smaller number of those (in VT & NH) that do accept God's Word. But these people are in the minority. Seek "freedom" in this world, but my admonition is that you put infinitely more energy into your efforts to seek "freedom in Christ!" My previous blog entry (one paragraph above) offers suggestions on how to go about that task. My published book does the same, but in even greater detail.

 

Why Libertarian philosophy & psychology cannot save you!

I've intended to write a blog entry of this nature for some time, but have not yet come to the point of doing it until now. Yet, I have written a fair number of tweets regarding this very topic. Now, I will expand a little bit more and discuss what I mean when I say that Libertarian philosophy and psychology are insufficient to save you!

When I speak of "Libertarian philosophy" or "psychology," I should emphasize the fact that I will refer to the elements which I consider to be the most respectable elements of these two terms, which in my view intersect. "Libertarian philosophy" has had input from notable people like the late Ayn Rand, the late Harry Browne, and a number of others. Notable "Libertarian psychologists" are people such as the late Dr. Haim Ginott and Dr. Nathaniel Branden (real name: Nathan Blumenthal). Both Libertarian philosophy and psychology feed off of each other in a continuous feedback loop. 

For more than a decade, I studied the writings of notable Libertarian (and psychology) writers, and I have considered myself to be a Libertarian at least since the year 1999, if not a little before that. Harry Browne's 1973 book "How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World" was a critical book in my life which turned me onto Libertarian thought. When I read this book (at the time), nearly everything in it made sense...at least from a humanistic perspective. Such admonitions as minding one's own business and staying out of other's business made good sense. Concerning one's self with only one's own "point of control" rather than attempting to pursuade others made sense. Such points as "being free" from government traps, family traps, selfishness traps, and the other "traps" that Browne mentioned in his book all made good sense. And to the credit of his book, those Libertarian-minded folks that followed nearly all of his advice have indeed become freer than the average person who just mindlessly follows all of the mainstream/establishment messages pushed through its various sources (mainstream magazines, news, TV, internet, etc). That would be the positive aspect of Libertarian thought in my view. 

From a humanistic standpoint alone, my evaluation is that Libertarianism is no doubt the best product on the market. If I had to choose between a Libertarian-minded person or some mindless Zombie drone (either a neolib or a neocon) as my neighbor, I would choose the Libertarian-minded person any day of the week. I prefer to be around people who mind their own business, and who take personal responsibility for what they do. In my personal experience, my Libertarian friends have routinely been highly respecting of my personal privacy, my personal space, and my individual rights. For that reason, Libertarian types can be a pleasure to live around. I maintain some of these traits myself, as I believe that I must be the type of person that I would like others to be towards me. Libertarianism certainly does have some redeeming qualities.

With the positive things that I have said about Libertarianism, I also see a dark side to it that many Libertarians are blissfully blind to. Because Libertarians tend towards the attitude of "live and let live" and to a tendency to not discuss belief systems (religious or otherwise), the average Libertarian will often consider themselves to be "atheists" or "agnostics." The best of the nonbelieving Libertarians will claim they are "agnostics" and will say that "they do not know if a God exists or not." As such, they will further say that because they do not know if God exists or not, then it follows that a believer (in God) should not know either. This premise is incorrect. Believers know that God exists, because His Word says so. The common Libertarian premise is that the Holy Bible is not the Word of God, and many will proclaim that it was not "God-inspired" even though 2 Timothy 3:16 says otherwise!

 ¹⁶ All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; (2 Timothy 3:16 NASB)

A large number of Libertarians will make numerous excuses as to why the Holy Bible is a flawed book. Some will claim that it was poorly interpreted, or written by a bunch of madmen. The History Channel can be thanked for that common perception due to some of their depictions in the past. There are other numerous "hit pieces" out there that portray the Bible as merely a piece of literature deserving of no more recognition than any other piece of literature. If you are a nonbelieving Libertarian reading this blog entry right now, fill in your own excuses as to why you think the Bible is flawed here: _____! I've heard many of the excuses, but I know I have not yet heard them all!

Not only do a large number of Libertarians believe that the Holy Bible is not legitimately the Word of God, many of them believe that the Bible is NOT necessary to do "good works!" After all, many Libertarians see themselves as "good people," because they mind their own business, they do not impose upon others, they negotiate rather than using force, etc. Certainly, such traits are admirable in my view. I would much rather live around Libertarians than around self-loathing neoliberals or neoconservatives! But, Libertarians need to realize that even our best works fall short of the glory of God (Romans 3:23). Further to that we are not saved by good works, we are saved by God's grace.

⁵ He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit, ⁶ whom He poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, ⁷ so that being justified by His grace we would be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life. (Titus 3:5-7 NASB)

I should also mention that in order to obtain God's grace, we must first have faith in Him! One point made in Romans 14:23 is that to act without faith (in God) is also a sin.

²³ But he who doubts is condemned if he eats, because his eating is not from faith; and whatever is not from faith is sin. (Roman 14:23 NASB)

Because a "lack of faith" in God is sin, it also follows those who do "good works" without faith are in essence still sinning against God! So, what appears to be "good works" may not always actually be! This statement applies to both believers and nonbelievers. Most nonbelieving Libertarians are likely to wince at such a seemingly "irrational" statement, but there is more...read on! 

You see, it is impossible for anyone (Libertarians included) to do anything pleasing to God without His grace! 

⁶ And without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is and that He is a rewarder of those who seek Him. (Hebrews 11:6 NASB)

Thus, my overall point is this. Even the best nonbelieving Libertarians can do "good works," but those good works may or may NOT be pleasing to God. You must FIRST have faith in God in order to have His gift of "grace." Because, without His grace, you can do little that is TRULY pleasing to God! 

Just because a Libertarian minds his/her own business or takes personal responsibility for his/her actions, this still does not mean that what they are doing is "pleasing to God!" To prove my point, I will further mention that many Libertarians that I know (or have known) are indeed the most "selfish" people I have ever known in my life. Many care only about what happens in their own lives, and could care less about other people that are less fortunate. Many even hold to "social darwinism" which essentially endorses the social concept of "survival of the fittest." Not all Libertarians necessarily hold to this concept, but a majority of the ones I have known hold to it in a staunch manner. Those Libertarians holding to "social darwinism" will sneer at the Holy Bible as God's Word, and they will further sneer at the concept that Jesus is God come in the flesh (1 John 4:2)! 

² By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God; (1 John 4:2 NASB)

The above verse (1 John 4:2) essentially divides those who believe from those who do not. It separates the true Christian believers from those who are essentially antichristians! That is right, you are either one or you are the other as harsh (or narrow-minded) as that sounds! 

I have known many nice, polite, and intelligent Libertarian-minded types over more than a decade, and I will tell you that only a very small percentage of them are believers in God and His Word - The Holy Bible. I also have to say that the Libertarian-minded types that I have known are also the highest educated and most intelligent people I have known in my life. However, as intelligent as they may be, too many of them view the Scriptures as foolishness! See 1 Corinthians 2:14-15 below:

¹⁴ But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised. ¹⁵ But he who is spiritual appraises all things, yet he himself is appraised by no one. (1 Corinthians 2:14-15 NASB)

Further to the above, I contend that even if I gave a Bible to a nonbelieving Libertarian to read, that even the most intelligent nonbelieving Libertarian would be incapable of fully understanding what he/she reads! There is a reason for this! God blinds the eyes & hearts of those who do NOT believe! 

⁸ just as it is written,

“God gave them a spirit of stupor,
Eyes to see not and ears to hear not,
Down to this very day.” (Romans 11:8 NASB)

⁴⁰ “He has blinded their eyes and He hardened their heart, so that they would not see with their eyes and perceive with their heart, and be converted and I heal them.” (John 12:40 NASB)

When nonbelievers are exposed to the truth that God actually blinds those that refuse to believe in Him or His Word (The Bible), there may be some who think that God is a cruel and unfair God! On one level, I can understand why some people would think this and the average nonbelieving Libertarian might ask the question: Why would I want to serve a God that behaves in such a manner? My reply to that would be this: God created human beings and he created the order of all things. It makes no difference whether we think He is a fair God or not. The fact remains that He is in total control, and He has the power to kill both our body and our soul! No other entity has that power! 

²⁸ Do not fear those who kill the body but are unable to kill the soul; but rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. (Matthew 10:28 NASB)

I know Libertarian psychology teaches that we should never be motivated by fear, but rather only by positive forces. There are times when such teachings are truthful (from a worldly perspective), but such teachings have no validity when it comes to God. We are to fear God above all else! We are to have faith that He exists, and that His Son (Jesus) sits at His right hand in Heaven! If we have that much faith, then and only then do we receive God's grace, which then opens our eyes, our heart, and minds so that we can understand and implement His Word (The Scriptures). Through God's grace, a believer of average (or below average) intelligence has a better chance of being able to implement what he/she has learned from Scripture than a highly intelligent nonbelieving Libertarian who believes he/she can "do good" on their own and without God's grace!

Lastly, I urge all nonbelieving Libertarians to humble their hearts, as that is often yet another weakness that intelligent nonbelieving Libertarians suffer with. Arrogance is not going to save you and help you to gain God's gift of grace either! Knowing that any good you have done is still garbage in the eyes of God is indeed a humbling thought! Because without a humble heart, you will NOT be saved!