What do Palestinian Muslims and (white) Americans share in common?

Those who are Zionist (Judeo) Christians or neocon Republicans in staunch support of the Nation of Israel often like to label those (like myself) who speak against Jews (and apostate Judaism) as lovers of Islam. Such a label might be true of some who speak against Israel (and/or Jews), but I can assure anyone that such a label would not be well fitting to someone like myself who is a reformed Christian. My perspective is quite different and unconventional. 

A simple concept is this: Muslims do not run the world. Many, if not most Muslims live in poor conditions, and that observation is one I am qualified to make as I have seen the poor Muslim nations as well as the more affluent ones. The wealthy Arabian Oil tycoons are the natural exception to my previous statement. These Arabs play along with the "mammon worshipers" of the world (i.e., the Jewish controllers), and they are rewarded for their participation in Satan's Jewish-run worldly kingdom. Muslims did not crucify Jesus, and so today, they do not share the same high status that Jews have acquired in the last 2000 years. 

So to my point, are the militant acts that Muslims commit against their oppressors justified? Perhaps, some of their acts are justified in the eyes of God, perhaps in other cases, such might not be the case. It is impossible for me to be the judge! Is every act of Muslim "resistance" an act of "terror" unjustified in the eyes of God? Pastor Chuck Baldwin (in his "Romans 13" book) would disagree. He contends that when governments treat citizens in an unjust manner, the citizens have a right to resist tyranny. Would those like-minded types (who agree with Baldwin) feel the same way towards Jewish-instigated oppression against Muslims in the Middle East or elsewhere? 

Many Judeo Christians in America are hypocritical on the above point. To them, it is "right" in the eyes of God for an "American Patriot" to resist his/her corrupt (Jewish-run) American government; however, it is "wrong" (in the eyes of God) for a Muslim in Palestine to resist his/her corrupt (Jewish-run) Israeli government which dictates most of what Palestinians can and will do on their own tiny slab of land. What confused thinking I might add!

Yet, as one can see, this issue is a very complex one with no easy "across-the-board" answers or solutions. From all that I can see, white patriotic Americans are in the same boat as poor Muslims are in Palestine. Both are oppressed by Jewish elites who run the world. Of course, the methods of oppression differ in flavor, yet the overarching result is the same - that is, white Americans are manipulated by Jewish elitist interests, just as the poor Muslims are in Palestine and the Middle East (and elsewhere)!

Also, please read this blog entry: "Are Jews the cause of global Islamic terrorism?" I wrote this entry a few months back depicting how Jewish control extends well beyond the reach of just Israel (and the Middle East). 

My hope is that white Americans (and all other Americans and goyim around the world) will understand the points expressed in this blog entry and begin to reexamine the brainwashing they have received from so many angles of Jewish-dominated culture. 



 

What on earth does it mean to be a "conservative?"

Finally, I decided to do a blog entry on what it means to be a "conservative." While I rarely use this term, it is what I most definitely consider myself to be. Some, if not many, aspects of what I believe fall within the lines of what a "libertarian" would believe, and when it comes to theology, my beliefs most definitely fall into the category of what some might define as being very orthodox or "conservative." 

However, my brand of "conservatism" differs rather greatly from the "All American" style of "neo-conservatism" that I have witnessed out on the internet and on Twitter. Being a city slicker myself, it is no wonder why my thinking differs from the "All American" view of what "conservatism" should be! The funny pic (above) depicts the cynical view of the average "All American conservative" often held by urbanites! The image of overweight, tough redneck types who cling to their Bibles & guns are legendary not only for American urbanites, but also for urban Europeans and others from around the world. And to be fair, rednecks are indeed some of the best riflemen in the world! I know this because of my previous military experience serving in an elite unit. Most of the guys that could shoot really well, were from the rural areas of like West Virginia, Arkansas, or Texas. The guys from the inner cities of NYC, LA, or DC were typically less skilled in the art of marksmanship. That was just my personal observation, not necessarily a fact!

Back to my point. So what is "conservative" and what is not? Let's start with the more commonly held public views or premises that are often tacitly pushed via Jewish-run mainstream media (MSM). 

The common view of the American Conservative:

1. Hates "big government" and claims to want smaller government. 
2. Is in favor of private gun ownership and the right to personal self-defense. 
3. Loves prosperity and favors private ownership rights (large house, car, etc).
4. Hates Birckenstocks and views them as the type of shoes that only neo-Liberals and hippies should be wearing. 
5. Some claim to be Christians, and of those who do, are typically Judeo Zionist Christians. Other conservatives are atheists or agnostics, and essentially believe that what they have was through their own work and efforts.
6. Are into hunting (both for food and for sport), and love to eat steak or potatoes. Those who are vegetarians or who are into "juicing" are looked upon as possibly being a "homosexual."
7. Claim to be against homosexual lifestyle, abortion, pornography, and illicit drugs.

While plenty more points could be added to the list above, I believe that many "All American" conservatives will likely agree with the list I compiled above. Yet, as a "conservative" myself, I can agree marginally with some of the points above. I will address each of the numbered points above with what I believe to be the pros/cons of each. 

Point #1: Hates "big government" and claims to want smaller government. 

Those of the libertarian mindset say they want smaller government, and that is exactly what they want... significantly smaller government. Yet, a very large contingent of neo-conservatives are in love with the Big Jewish-run and owned wars in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. They have bought into the lie that if we defeat "Christian-hating" Muslims "over there," we will not have to "fight them on our own soil!" The alleged "threat" of Muslims taking over America has been pushed hard in the media, and has also seen increased coverage in many mainline "alternative truther" news outlets. 

For certain, I do not want to see Muslims taking over America, nor do I want to ever see laws that would mandate that we all must worship Allah! Yet, with such a large contingent of "Judeo Christians" (70 Million+) in America, I could easily imagine the Jewish elites manipulating and staging a situation where Muslims do gain significant political power in America. After all, it is in the interest of the Jews running America to significantly destroy the "identity" of a "white Christian" America. Further, elitist Jews see that it is necessary to maintain a firm grip among Judeo Christians, and to accomplish such a feat, it is necessary to have the average Judeo Christian living in a constant state of "fear"...i.e., the fear of "boogeymen" such as the "evil" Muslims who are supposedly aiming to take over America! What better than for Jews to engage their Christian supporters in taking active participation in their Jewish-run crimes against humanity (i.e. the "big wars" in Iraq, etc), doing the "dirty work" so that Jews can claim plausible deniability for any blood that is shed?

Therefore, so many neo-con Judeo Christians are going to claim they are "conservative," but they are the very ones who have cried out to "big government" (run by their Jewish masters) to "save them" from those "evil" Muslims and it is these people who have NOT been conservative at all with my tax dollars (or yours)! Can anyone detect hypocrisy?

Point #2: Is in favor of private gun ownership and the right to personal self-defense. 

On this point, I can agree with many of the chief tenants about private gun ownership, and right to self defense. 

Yet, many neo-con conservatives who claim to be "pro-Corporation" fail to realize that it is the big corporations who are in full cahoots with the Jewish-run system to disarm the American public. That point is made in my previous blog entry called "Gun buyback in Van Nuys Masonic Temple." Many "conservatives" and "libertarians" would accuse me of being "liberal" because I speak negatively about large Corporations. Many of them believe that large corporations are merely a spinoff of the so-called "free market." Argue what you may, but I will note that most of today's corporations are Jewish-run, owned, or at the very least -- manipulated! And as Mussolini indicated, the merger of corporations and government yield fascism. 

Point #3: Loves prosperity and favors private ownership rights (large house, car, etc).

Many, but not all, conservatives seem to favor the so-called "American Dream" which is to get married, to have kids (two or three is common), to buy that nice large 4 bedroom house, and to have two or three sedans or SUV's parked out front. Those who live in large urban areas are going to need a large income to support this level or standard of living, and in 2013, there are fewer people/families that can afford this type of living accommodation than just a few years earlier. Yet, many conservatives, even today, pride themselves on still maintaining the above arbitrary standard of the "American Dream." 

In my view, even if one can afford the above, why not consider breaking the "American Dream" standard arbitrarily pushed by Jewish elites and keep more of the money that you have earned over the years where it belongs...in your pocket! While many conservatives believe that obtaining the "American Dream" is the ultimate "conservative goal," I argue just how conservative such a goal really is! 

What is "conservative" about obtaining a leveraged 30 year mortgage on a $1 Million to $2 Million dollar house, which is common for many nicer homes in larger urban areas? What is conservative about paying property taxes which amount to that which would be approximately the same as the monthly rent of any apartment in the same general location? The point I am making is that many so-called "conservatives" spend way more money than they need to! 

In my view, a true conservative lives beneath the level of comfort mandated by that which the Jewish elite have defined as the "American Dream." It is they who have told us lemmings what we should want, and what we should not want! So many conservatives are drinking their Koolaid, and if the Jewish banksters ever decide to pull the carpet out from beneath our feet, indeed there will be many very poor conservatives living in nice homes and nice cars in their parking lot, but with no money to fuel them, and no money or means to even feed themselves or their families! 

Point #4: Hates Birckenstocks and views them as the type of shoes that only neo-Liberals and hippies should be wearing. 

There are Jewish run companies often in trendy parts of town that allow their employees to dress casually, but who are opposed to them wearing Birckenstock sandals. A friend of mine worked for a medium-sized Jewish-owned company, and she told me that "Birckenstocks" were explicitly banned in the employee handbook. Yet, the employees there would wear nearly any other type of sandals or flip flops, and those were permitted. 

By the way, the CFO was a Jew, and he was the one who was responsible for this policy. Jews who are "mammon" or "money" oriented have done what they can to make "Birkenstocks" (or "Jesus sandals") uncool or not trendy! The common perception is that only liberal hippies wear them. Even Alex Jones (aka Alex Jonestein) makes fun of them on his popular radio show!

It is my contention that Jews have a natural hatred of nearly anything that even remotely reminds them of Jesus! Thus, if you live an area with a high Jewish population, and you want to irritate them, wear Birkenstocks! It will remind them of who they crucified 2000 years ago! 

While I do not wear Birkenstocks myself, I'm thinking that it might be a good time to start doing so! From all that I am told, they are extremely comfortable sandals, which are great for long distance urban walking. OBTW, most rich Jews don't like to walk too far...that is for the poor goyim! They would rather race around in their BMW's, Mercedes, or Rolls Royces!

Point #5: Some claim to be Christians, and of those who do, are typically Judeo Zionist Christians. Other conservatives are atheists or agnostics, and essentially believe that what they have was through their own work and efforts. 

As Rev. Jerry Falwell stated, there are over 70 Million+ Zionist Judeo Christians living in America. And, I would say a mass majority of them consider themselves to be "conservatives." However, as I will contend, their brand of Christianity is anything but "conservative." Their Biblical interpretation is often "legalistic" which falls into the liberal category of theology, and their desire for "big government" support of big Jewish wars (like the Iraq war) are anything but conservative. Judeo Christians, by and large, are huge supporters of big government, even though they hypocritically proclaim a desire for "small government!" See the funny pic (above)!

For those wanting more information on the liberal aspects of Judeo Christianity, you need to read "Why Muslims are persecuting Christians in the Middle East." You also should read some of my other previous blog entries which are tagged under the term "Zionism" or "Eschatology." 

As for those of you in the more "rational" conservative camp -- i.e., those of you who are "libertarians," I can agree a good bit more of what you believe, but there are things that you folks are also neglecting. Please read this entry entitled "Why Libertarian philosophy & psychology cannot save you!" This one is a critical read with a number of complex points which differentiate between libertarian truth and Biblical truth. While the intended audience is atheist libertarians, I am actually targeting atheists or agnostics of all varieties.

Point #6: Are into hunting (both for food and for sport), and love to eat steak or potatoes. Those who are vegetarians or who are into "juicing" are looked upon as possibly being a "homosexual." 

I suppose we can all thank people like the legendary Rocker Ted Nugent for this one! The concept that hunting and "meat eating" are the only pathway to becoming a true conservative. In my book, I point out that hunting is in accordance to Scripture; however, I make the point that the Bible only condones hunting for food, not for sport! Yet, Ted Nugent (and many others like him) believe that hunting for sport is also a "good thing." In my book, I differentiate between the two...one being in accordance to Scripture while the other is not. I also express my appreciation of animals as a part of God's creation which we are to love and respect when are not looking for meat to eat. That blog entry is called "What squirrels can teach the rest of us about life and about survival."

Also, if one views the funny pic (above), notice just how fat that lady is! Correct me if I am wrong, but my perception is that there are a lot of rural folk who have the same or similar body type. I should mention that there are a lot of her body type in the urban Jewish communities as well! For those that do not know, eating meat is very common among Jewish communities. They eat tons of it, and their obese body types are the evidence to prove that fact! 

Eating meat is fine as long as it is done in very "conservative" amounts! Notice the word "conservative" is often totally ignored by a high percentage of so-called "conservative" Americans! Some people eat meat nearly every day or every night for dinner! Those who do that, can and will eventually become obese. 

Once again, American conservatives who pride themselves on their hunting prowess, are not very "conservative" when it comes to the number of animals that they eat in a year! It is this very point that I make to depict just how "out of balance" many Americans are in their consumption of food. Is there anything conservative Americans can ever do that is in balance? 

How about eating meat once per week and then juicing on another day, and then eating some vegetables on yet another? Now that would actually be conservative! You would be using resources in balance, and I promise you that you would NOT look like the fat lady in the funny pic (above)! That is my promise to anyone who engages in genuine "conservative" dietary habits. 

Please note, that I am not judging you on what you eat. I am simply suggesting a more "conservative" dietary plan that is more balanced and more conservative! Those who eat less are more conservative than those who engage in gluttony! And for that, the Bible has a few harsh words to say on that topic.

¹⁹ whose end is destruction, whose god is their appetite, and whose glory is in their shame, who set their minds on earthly things. (Philippians 3:19; NASB)

²⁰ Do not be with heavy drinkers of wine,
Or with gluttonous eaters of meat; (Proverbs 23:20; NASB)

³¹ Whether, then, you eat or drink or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. (1 Corinthians 10:31; NASB)

Therefore, my admonition is to become a true conservative and eat less, and to eat in a more balanced manner. You will be glad you ever did!

Point #7: Claim to be against homosexual lifestyle, abortion, pornography, and illicit drugs. 

I agree with the tenants of point #7, as many Christians do. However, there are some Christians who claim that homosexuality can be combined with living in accordance to God's Word. So-called "homosexual Christians" are one type who proclaim this, and I refuted their claim in a previous blog entry called ""One can be "gay" & Jewish, but not "gay" & Christian"" In this entry, I provide evidence right out of the Bible which depicts why the homosexual lifestyle and Biblical living cannot go together. 

It appears that many Zionist Judeo Christians and reformist ones (like myself) can agree on many of the tenants of point #7. Therefore, I will not go to exhaustive length regarding this one. However, that said, we should also note the hypocrisy of (some) neocons at the higher levels who participated in homosexual orgies at Bohemian Grove (watch the Alex Jones film). Here again, there are SOME so-called "conservatives" who claim to be against homosexuality, but then engage in it themselves. 

Conclusion:

Hopefully, this blog entries adds some clarity to the term -- "Conservative." In my view, a conservative is one who truly does conserve. He/she lives beneath the comfort level of that which the Jewish elites have set as "the standard" of what the "American Dream" should be. Remember, the Jewish elites want you to be poor. They want the average American to make and save less money, but to spend MORE of their hard-earned money. They have brainwashed Americans to want the big house, or expensive car, which is the very reason why so many Americans are NOT free! 

You only become a conservative when you "break the chains" of Jewish mind-control! Those who would like to learn how to become a true conservative (that actually does conserve), read my ENTIRE blog, and buy and read my book on survival preparation.

It is there that you will learn to get more out of life with less!

Walter Veith discusses SDA Eschatology

Description of the above video clip:

Part 2 is a study of the king of the south that pushes against Catholicism at the time of the end, but it also investigates the intrigues of setting up the conditions for the final victory of the king of the north. The secret intrigues of Napoleon, the setting up of a false system of worship, and a counterfeit theology regarding the antichrist, the dispensationalist view, and the creation of the Jewish state and Zionism are all discussed. Viewers will be surprised to discover the origin of the Jews and the state of Israel. This DVD concludes the study of Daniel 11 and prepares the way for the modern fulfillment of these prophecies.

MY COMMENTS:

One of my gracious Twitter followers ("CassTete") passed this video clip (via this link) to me for my review. A little online searching reveals that Walter Veith is a Seventh Day Adventist (SDA). I grew up in that church in my earlier years and moved well away from it, because I did not agree with it's mainline doctrine. But, Veith makes so many truthful points in this clip, that I could not resist posting it onto my blog.

Most SDAs hold to the belief that the final "antichrist" is the Pope, and they believe it is the Vatican that secretly runs the world. From my experience and knowledge, such beliefs run contrary to what I have seen and witnessed in my own life. Rome does not run the world, global Jewry runs the world, and such a concept flies well over the heads of most SDAs. Veith does a nice job of explaining the Jewish masonic elite, the true nature of the Talmud, the "Israel of God," the issues surrounding the destruction of the Jewish Temple, and much more! This is a nice presentation.

I can't fully endorse everything that he proclaims, but I can say that many of the issues addressed in this video clip are truthful to that of my understanding. 

The video clip is 1 hour and 38 minutes, and it is well worth the time to view it! 

UPDATE - NOVEMBER 2, 2013:

"CassTete" provided me with this youtube clip of Walter Veith where he discusses SDA law with his reasons for the beliefs that he holds to. Much of it appears more along the lines of mainline SDA doctrine, some, if not much of which I disagree with. If I agreed with a fair amount of Veith's points in the video clip above, then I will say the inverse of that is the case in the video clip below.

In this 1 hour video clip, one can learn much about what mainline SDA's believe. He gets into a number of issues, including the issue of the "Sabbath" and observance of days. He's heard the accusation that SDA's are viewed as legalists, and to that criticism, he prefers to say that he is a "loyalist." By that, he means that he (as an SDA) is more "loyal" to Scripture than to people like me who would refer to SDAs as liberal "legalists." To be fair, SDA's do take aspects of Scripture, and interpret it in a literalistic form. Those doing this with Old Testament (in particular) Scripture are bound to ignore historical context. In ignoring historical context, misinterpretation of Scripture is a foregone reality.

Jesus chastised the Pharisees and violated "Sabbath" observance when He would heal people and perform other miracles (on the Sabbath day)! Jesus was sick and tired of legalism among the Pharisees, and today, the same Pharisitical attitudes are among Jews and Judaizing Christians of today! 

Since Jesus' ushering in of the New Covenant, Sabbath-observance, like many other feasts & customs have been relegated to their proper place -- the types and shadows of the past (i.e., the Old Covenant before Christ). 

Veith contends that Jesus has not fully fulfilled the "Sabbath" because there is still sin in the world today! For sure, there is still sin in the world. Yet, full redemption (as referenced in Revelation 20 - 22) is not a requirement "for the people of God" (ref to Hebrews 4:9) to obtain Sabbath "rest." Yet, the "rest" that SDA's (and Judaic Jews) observe is merely the legalistic observance of days, and ceasing to do "work" (however that term may be defined). There is a spiritual aspect to this concept of "rest" and it is described in Hebrews 4:

⁹ So there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God. ¹⁰ For the one who has entered His rest has himself also rested from his works, as God did from His. (Hebrews 4:9-10 NASB)

The Sabbath rest is more than just taking one day (Saturday) off and working all other days of the week. True Sabbath rest actually means "rest" from the sinful and wicked ways of the world everyday of the week, and month after month, and year after year. When we accept Jesus' sacrifice on for our sins, and when we live according to His Word, that my friends is the true "rest" that we get. That "rest" is what it means to "live free in Christ"... a foreign concept to MOST Christians of today! Yes, sin still exist around us (as Veith truthfully indicates), but we are at "rest" even when the world has not yet seen full redemption, which is yet future (ref: Revelation 20 - 22). 

Judaic Jews never found the "rest" that I am referring to in the previous paragraph. Most of them have been "mammon-worshipers" (i.e., worshipers of money) throughout the ages and up until today. Even if they "rest" on Saturday, many of them don't even find "true" rest on that day, because their minds are so wrapped up with their over-complicated lives, and just how they're going to ramp up the "money-changing" scams on Monday morning and the remaining days of that week! There is no "rest" in money-changing! There is no "rest" for the wicked (to express this concept more broadly)! They may make alot of money, but these people NEVER find "rest!" So to the SDA out there, the Bible advocates that you NOT emulate the Jews...i.e., do not be a "Judaizer" as the Book of Titus explicitly indicates.

Another critical verse is Colossians 2:16-17. 

¹⁶ Therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day— ¹⁷ things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the substance belongs to Christ.
(Colossians 2:16-17 NASB)

As believers in Christ, we are not to pass judgment on other "believers" for what they eat or whether (or not) they observe festivals or days (like the "Sabbath day"). 

Also, Veith may have never considered why it is that the New Testament (NT) reiterates 9 of the 10 Commandments in the Old Testament (OT). And can you guess which of the "10 Commandments" for which there is no mention of to observe in the NT? It is the issue of Sabbath observance! I have challenged several SDA preachers with this question, and none have been able to even provide an answer to my question. 

Why then is Veith implying that those who don't observe days (like the Sabbath) are still living in "Babylon?" The above verse states that the Sabbath, and Mosaic-backed legalistic dietary laws that Adventists like to impose upon themselves (and others) are shadowy aspects of the past. When SDAs behave in such a manner, they are in total violation of Colossians 2:16.

Certainly, vegetarianism has many wonderful health benefits, and I advocate it within proper limits. I don't advocate strict veganism. But, I do advocate eating fish, cheese, milk, etc. As believers in Christ, we are not to judge others by what they eat, or by whether (or not) they observe shadowy Mosaic customs of the past that were for the Jews of the day.

Indeed, Jews were wicked throughout the Old Covenant, and God (via Moses) needed to discipline them. He did so by giving Jews (not Gentiles) the "10 Commandments" to follow. Today, people are just as wicked, and so Jesus gave all of us "The Commandments." Notice that I did NOT say the "10 Commandments." The NT gives us 9 of the 10 Commandments of the OT plus a new commandment to "love one another as yourself." 

³⁴ A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love one another. (John 13:34 NASB)

The "remnant ones" that the SDA consider themselves to be have added to the NT, all sorts of shadowy things of the past that Jesus long since fulfilled with the blood that He shed on the Cross! Would it not seem that Jesus would take a dim view of such practices for that which He fulfilled?  

There's really not much more I need to say about "Sabbath-observance." Jesus violated the legalistic aspects of it by doing legitimate "work" on that day, and He proved that what really matters is "righteousness," not liberal "legalism!"

UPDATE - May 11, 2013:

To the readers out there, I felt a need to copy/paste a blog entry that gives a basic explanation of why Sabbath observance (or observance of days) is no longer a Biblical requirement. 

Why don't we observe the original Sabbath?

Thanks for asking!

This issue has been a sticking point between sabbatarians and the rest of the Body of Christ for some time...but it shouldn't be. The Bible is very clear on this subject. Let's forget for a moment about Constantine, or that the Sabbath was a sign between God and the Israelites of their covenant (and so completely out of date) and focus on God's purpose for the Sabbath.

Let's start in Genesis...

The word "sabbath" means "rest". This isn't the kind of rest we need after a good workout. The word literally means 'the ending of activity'. God didn't rest on the seventh day because He was tired. God had finished creating the world, and so He stopped. He didn't pick up where He left off when the weekend was over...He was done.

Let's move to Exodus...

God's covenant with the children of Israel included a lot of religious activity, including the creation of a tabernacle, sacrifices of animals, and so on. This activity only stopped on the Sabbath. Now, remember: the Sabbath isn't about being tired...it's about being finished with your work. The priests couldn't stop working the way that God did in Genesis. They took a day off and went right back to it the next day. Why? Because the work wasn't finished. They did the same things day after day, year after year. They were even forbidden to have chairs in the tabernacle because sitting down would suggest that their work was done!

Let's keep going to the New Testament...

The Exodus Sabbath was a symbol of God's rest in Genesis. It told the children of Israel that they would someday be able to stop working...to stop sacrificing for their own sins. When Jesus died and rose again, that day had finally come. In Hebrews 10:11-12 we see the comparison between the Jewish priests and Jesus:

Day after day every priest stands and performs his religious duties; again and again he offers the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But when this priest [Jesus] had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God.

Jesus finished His work and rested, just as we see God doing in Genesis.

What about us?

How then should we view the Sabbath? God rested when His work was done, and Jesus rested when His work was done. The ancient Jews never enjoyed that rest, but it's available to us today, as Hebrews 4:9-10 tell us:

There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God's rest also rests from his own work, just as God did from his.

Let's look at Colossians 2:16-17, which should erase any doubt about the nature of the Sabbath:

Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ.

From all of these verses we can see that the Sabbath clearly isn't a day of the week. It's neither Saturday nor Sunday! We enter into the Sabbath rest when we stop working, and that only happens when we accept that Jesus' sacrifice was for each of us. His work is done, and He invites us to join Him.

Posted: Sun, Feb 10 2008 - 22:24 PM (Source link: http://godwords.org/posts.php?id=78 )

Also, for a more in-depth analysis, read a book by Dr. Jay Adams called Keeping the Sabbath Today? This book is the best I have seen on this topic. 

Are Jews the cause of global Islamic terrorism?

One of my thoughtful Twitter followers challenged me on a statement that I had made, and so I felt the need to write a blog entry on the topic of global Islamic terrorism. I had said that "Zionism" is a root cause for Islamic suicide terrorism. And, he indicated that Zionism was in no way connected to terrorism in places like Bali, Indonesia. For those who do not remember, there was a massive complex suicide bombing attack at a Kuta Beach nightclub (i.e., the Sari Club) in Bali, which occurred on October 12, 2002. Over 200 people were killed! Having been to both Bali and Jakarta, and having been in that nightclub myself, I have to say that when this bombing occurred, it struck my interest far more than that of most Americans, who are pretty well removed from places like Indonesia. A decade ago, there were very few Americans even visiting places like Indonesia. Most of the "foreigners" that I remember there were Dutch, Germans, Swedes, Brits, and other Europeans. (I digress.)

Back to my point, I can understand why many people would think that there is no way "Jews" could be involved in the manipulation or staging of terrorist acts in lands that are far removed from places like the nation of Israel. As we all know, "suicide attacks" carried out by fundamentalist Islamists occur in many other areas of the world other than Israel/Palestine (or the Middle East) alone. For certain, motives vary for each individual attack with some things being the same, and other things being different. 

However, when I make statements that "Jews" and "Zionists" are behind the phenomenon of Islamic suicide terrorism on a global scale, I am not necessary implying that every single attack is a "staged" "false-flag" type of event, I am saying that motives (on a broad scale) are a response to the globalized "New World Order" (NWO) system that has been in increased development over the years! And as many people who have read my writings, you know pretty well about the statement that I commonly make - "Jews control the world." Stated in similar terms - "Jews control 'globalization!'" I will further state that Zionists use "globalization" to obtain their desired end of global world domination and control.

First off, I will provide a concise snapshot of just what I mean when I say Jews control "globalization." For that, consider Brother Nathanael Kapner's concise definition in under 3 minutes. 

And here are a few written points from this script which are written below, and can be found here:

"The battle for our planet has now begun.
The battle cry for those who wish to rule over us is their watchword, “Globalization.”
Globalization is fueled by the Jewish Oligarchs of finance capital who dictate to corporations a borderless labor force wherever its sweat is cheapest and its intellect offers itself at 50% off.
Textile weavers, engineers, computer programmers, are pouring out of the crevices of China and in India.
That’s why Jewish finance, investment banks like NM Rothschild & Sons, Wolfensohn Group, Oppenheimer Funds, Goldman Sachs, and Sanford Weil’s Citigroup, are building their ivory towers in Shanghai, Mumbai, and in Bangalore.
But, if any shade of yellow or brown should offer its sweat and its intellect at wholesale prices, that’s where their ivory towers will go.
You see, people, presidents, prime ministers, whether their names are Singh, Wan, or Ying, are just pawns in the game of the Jewish Oligarchs of Globalization.
“Governance” not “Governors” is what makes for global rule."

Kapner's quote above serves as a nice concise definition of what the term "globalization" means, and who runs it! There are winners in globalization and there are losers in this game. The winners for sure are wealthy Jews all over the world, and others of means and resources. The losers are those in Palestinian territories, and in poorer countries like Pakistan, Indonesia, and a slew of others. 

Dr. T. O'Connor has written an essay called "Terrorism as Antiglobalization." And in this essay, there is some insight that backs up my point that Islamic "terrorists" are lashing out because they are getting the short end of the schtick so to speak! 

"The twelve most important seam states (remembering that these are fluid) are: Algeria, Brazil, Egypt, Greece, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Pakistan, the Philippines, South Africa, Thailand, and Turkey.  If properly supported in their homeland security efforts, these seam states could form an effective barrier or buffer against terrorist networks.  However, terrorists have already established strong havens in at least four of these states (Pakistan, Indonesia, the Philippines, and Brazil).  While failed states do indeed create fertile breeding grounds for crime, human rights abuses, disease, and starvation, it is possible that terrorists do not see them as all that attractive because the typically uncontrolled security forces there may be unable to distinguish between a terrorist base of operations and an indigenous base of operations. ...
There is no proof that "poverty causes terror" (Mousseau 2003).  However, there might be something to Shelley's (2006) failed states argument and "unholy trinity" whereby losers in the market globalization process can be expected to fight back anyway they can to preserve their little fiefdoms of criminal enterprise characterized by the presence of easily bribable officials."
(Source: O'Connor, T.  (2011). "Terrorism as Antiglobalization," MegaLinks in Criminal Justice. Retrieved from http://www.drtomoconnor.com/3420/3420lect02a.htm accessed on Oct. 19, 2011.)

Whether what Dr. O'Connor says is fact or not, I agree with his assessment given my own experience in the Middle East and Southeast Asia. It is not "poverty" that is inspiring Islamic militants (in places like Indonesia) to conduct suicide attacks, it is market "globalization" and it's aspects which run counter to the values of people in places like Indonesia.

So far, my point is this: Jews run and control "globalization" designed to oppress other parts of the world - a Zionist objective (per N. Kapner) and the aspects of Jewish-run "globalization" are a root cause and inspiration to certain elements of people in places (like Indonesia) who will conduct suicide attacks in response to the forces of Jewish-run "globalization." 

In addition, I'll add one more point, which pertains to a "truther" that I hold in high regard - Wayne Madsen. This guy has done many interesting things in his life and has experienced the world on many fronts. He is no Alex Jones. He didn't come out of his parent's nest and launch into the "truther" movement outright. He fought his way through the trenches before doing what he does today. After digging on the internet, I was surprised to find his report called "US/Israeli Connection to Bali Bombing" by Wayne Madsen 3-27-07." In this report, Madsen asserts the following:

Our Indonesian and American sources report that there was a significant U.S. and Israeli military-intelligence connection to the October 12, 2002 bombings of the Sari Club in Bali, Indonesia....After the bombing and the plane's departure, the tower logs were altered at Denpasar Airport to indicate the Dash 7 had not landed there. However, in a major oversight, the apron logs were not tampered with. Our sources have revealed the Dash 8 was Israeli-owned....Our sources also indicate that the then-U.S. ambassador to Indonesia, Ralph Boyce, who is now posted as ambassador to Thailand, was fully aware of U.S. intelligence pre-knowledge of the terrorist bombing in Bali. (Source: US/Israeli Connection to Bali Bombing by Wayne Madsen 3-27-7)

The above report was Madsen's original report in 2007. Then on August 28, 2011, Madsen posted some updated information which indicates that this Bali bombing could have in fact been a Mossad "false flag" operation. It is disturbing to say the least. And why would Israel (and International Jews) have desired to stage the Bali Bombing? Possibly because they wanted to draw Australia into the US/British-led War in Iraq! That would be a perfect motive, would it not?

"In light of WMR's previous report on Mossad playing a substantial role in the devastating bombing of downtown Oslo, we have obtained an exclusive photograph of a suspected Israeli intelligence operative laughing it up with an Indonesian police officer on October 13, 2002, the morning after the deadly bombings of the night club district of Kuta in Bali at 11:05 pm on October 12. At least 202 and maybe as many as 400 people died in the twin explosions. Most of the dead were Australians on holiday. The attack spurred Australian Prime Minister John Howard into joining the U.S.-British war in Afghanistan and, later, in Iraq." (Source: Jakarta: Mossad presence laughing it up after Bali Bombing; Wayne Madsen, Aug 28, 2011.)

And for full effect, have a glimpse at a the photo (below) of the only Westerner and Madsen's description of this photo. Apparently, it is believed that he was an Israeli Jew. It is revealing. 

"The western man pictured, the only westerner seen in the immediate vicinity of Bali's "Ground Zero," is standing at the police lines and looking toward the bombed and burned out debris of the Paddy Pub and the Sari Club, located across the street. While the civilian Balinese and Indonesian Marines, Army, police, and Special Forces were traumatized by what happened the night before, the suspected Israeli was noticeably happy at the somber scene of destruction. He was so happy, a journalist immediately dispatched to the scene from Jakarta decided to snap the man's photograph. The man's joviality at a scene where there were human intestines and other body parts strewn across exposed re-bar stripped of concrete and hideously burned bodies made him the subject of immediate suspicion."  (Source: Jakarta: Mossad presence laughing it up after Bali Bombing; Wayne Madsen, Aug 28, 2011.)

Need I say more? We have evidence that points in the direction that not only International Jews were possibly involved in the Bali bombing, but rather, the possibility that Israeli Jews (of the Mossad) could have been involved in this devastating attack in Bali! Certainly there was a motive - to involve the increased support of Australia in the Iraq War!

However, even if the Israeli Mossad had no connection to this attack, my point that Jewish-run and controlled "globalization" is in fact a key instigator of Islamic suicide terrorism. The Jews imposing their NWO upon others around the world can certainly expect backlash as a result. The situation in Palestine is not all that different from Indonesia. Jews imposing their agenda in Gaza face backlash, just as when Jews impose their global agenda in places like Indonesia. Certain things are different, but the overarching aspects remain the same.